-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improvements to L1 offline DQM - part 1 #19590
Comments
A new Issue was created by @tapperad . @davidlange6, @Dr15Jones, @smuzaffar can you please review it and eventually sign/assign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
assign dqm, l1 |
New categories assigned: dqm,l1 @kmaeshima,@vanbesien,@mulhearn,@vazzolini,@dmitrijus,@rekovic you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks |
Hi, this issue should be assigned to @kreczko please. |
[93X] Improvements to L1 Offline DQM - part 1 (issue #19590)
@thomreis yes |
+1 |
+1 |
This issue is fully signed and ready to be closed. |
Here is a list of requested changes to:
cmssw/DQMOffline/L1Trigger/src/L1TStage2CaloLayer2Offline.cc
For the recoHTT and recoMHT we want to restrict the |eta| of the jets to < 2.5.
In the hardware the eta ranges and jet Et thresholds are set separately for HT and MHT (though they are currently the same value). Going forward it may be good to allow the same functionality in the DQM code i.e. separate configurable thresholds for eta range and Et threshold each for HT and MHT.
Cheers,
Alex.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: