-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 184
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BuildRules] First implementation of RocM build rules #8268
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for branch IB/CMSSW_13_0_X/master. @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @aandvalenzuela, @iarspider can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see more details here: Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test test-das-selected-lumis had ERRORS ---> test test_edmPickEvents had ERRORS Comparison SummarySummary:
|
please test |
Pull request #8268 was updated. |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3c42a7/30212/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Pull request #8268 was updated. |
please test with cms-sw/cmssw#40619 |
Pull request #8268 was updated. |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3c42a7/30221/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
👍🏻 the ROCm tests compiled and ran, as much as they can without a GPU:
and
|
Pull request #8268 was updated. |
please test with cms-sw/cmssw#40619 |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3c42a7/30228/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+externals |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_13_0_X/master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@smuzaffar I'm trying to build some simple HIP/ROCm device code, and I noticed that when
Do we need to add |
No description provided.