Add non-decorrelated DeepDoubleX tagger scores

[dmajumder]

PR description:

The previous DeepDoubleX tagger added to NanoAOD (PR#347) was for the mass-decorrelated version.

This PR includes the non-decorrelated version in NanoAOD.

The non-mass-decorrelated version gives a better performance than the mass-correlated version:
https://indico.cern.ch/event/795581/contributions/3337046/attachments/1836661/3009499/CMS_HFW_Dubrovnik.pdf#page=12

Depending on the analysis selections, the user has a choice of either.

PR validation:

Tested in CMSSW_10_2_14 following the recipe in:
https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/physTools/3659/1.html

[gpetruc-bot]

Automatic test started, see https://gitlab.cern.ch/cms-nanoAOD/nanoAOD-integration/pipelines/968715/builds

[gpetruc-bot]

Please update PhysicsTools/NanoAOD/python/nanoDQM_cfi.py: take this patch or run prepareDQM.py -d -u nano_file_mc.root, and then if needed adjust the plot range using some human common sense.

[gpetruc-bot]

Automatic test report for 968715

• gitlab pipeline at https://gitlab.cern.ch/cms-nanoAOD/nanoAOD-integration/pipelines/968715/builds
• outputs at https://cms-nanoaod-integration.web.cern.ch/integration/test_pr_371/

Code integration

Code checks not run for this PR (no source files modified)

Please update PhysicsTools/NanoAOD/python/nanoDQM_cfi.py: take this patch or run prepareDQM.py -d -u nano_file_mc.root, and then if needed adjust the plot range using some human common sense.

Tests

• Long test data102X (10000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
• Long test data80X (10000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
• Long test data80Xhip (3000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
• Long test data94X (10000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
• Long test data94X2016 (10000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
• Long test data94Xv2 (10000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
• Long test mc102X (9000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
• Long test mc80X (10000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
• Long test mc94X (10000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
• Long test mc94X2016 (9000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
• Long test mc94Xv2 (9000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
• Test mc_94Xv2: passed
• Test mc_102X: passed
• Test data_94X: passed
• Test data_102X: passed

Disk size report

Sample	kb/event	ref kb/event	diff
TTbar MC 102X	1.834	1.830	0.004 ( +0.2% )
TTbar MC 94Xv1	1.928	1.924	0.003 ( +0.2% )
TTbar MC 94Xv2	1.961	1.956	0.004 ( +0.2% )
TTbar MC 94X2016	1.749	1.744	0.005 ( +0.3% )
TTbar MC 80X	1.903	1.901	0.002 ( +0.1% )
Data 102X	0.972	0.963	0.009 ( +0.9% )
Data 94Xv1	0.918	0.913	0.005 ( +0.5% )
Data 80X	0.794	0.793	0.002 ( +0.2% )
Data 80X, Mu Run2016E	0.775	0.775	0.000 ( +0.0% )

[dmajumder]

@peruzzim hope this is OK.
BTW on the above comment for the DQM:
"Please update PhysicsTools/NanoAOD/python/nanoDQM_cfi.py: take this patch or run prepareDQM.py -d -u nano_file_mc.root, and then if needed adjust the plot range using some human common sense."
What needs to be changed?

[gpetruc-bot]

Automatic test started, see https://gitlab.cern.ch/cms-nanoAOD/nanoAOD-integration/pipelines/1105370/builds

[gpetruc-bot]

Please update PhysicsTools/NanoAOD/python/nanoDQM_cfi.py: take this patch or run prepareDQM.py -d -u nano_file_mc.root, and then if needed adjust the plot range using some human common sense.

[gpetruc-bot]

Automatic test report for 1105370

• gitlab pipeline at https://gitlab.cern.ch/cms-nanoAOD/nanoAOD-integration/pipelines/1105370/builds
• outputs at https://cms-nanoaod-integration.web.cern.ch/integration/test_pr_371/

Code integration

Code checks not run for this PR (no source files modified)

Please update PhysicsTools/NanoAOD/python/nanoDQM_cfi.py: take this patch or run prepareDQM.py -d -u nano_file_mc.root, and then if needed adjust the plot range using some human common sense.

Tests

• Long test data102X (10000 events): passed, with differences; dqm plots: all, diff
• Long test data80X (10000 events): passed, with differences; dqm plots: all, diff
• Long test data80Xhip (3000 events): passed, with differences; dqm plots: all, diff
• Long test data94X (10000 events): passed, with differences; dqm plots: all, diff
• Long test data94X2016 (10000 events): passed, with differences; dqm plots: all, diff
• Long test data94Xv2 (10000 events): passed, with differences; dqm plots: all, diff
• Long test mc102X (9000 events): passed, with differences; dqm plots: all, diff
• Long test mc80X (10000 events): passed, with differences; dqm plots: all, diff
• Long test mc94X (10000 events): passed, with differences; dqm plots: all, diff
• Long test mc94X2016 (9000 events): passed, with differences; dqm plots: all, diff
• Long test mc94Xv2 (9000 events): passed, with differences; dqm plots: all, diff
• Test mc_94Xv2: passed
• Test mc_102X: passed
• Test data_94X: passed
• Test data_102X: passed

Disk size report

Sample	kb/event	ref kb/event	diff
TTbar MC 102X	1.833	1.831	0.002 ( +0.1% )
TTbar MC 94Xv1	1.926	1.924	0.002 ( +0.1% )
TTbar MC 94Xv2	1.959	1.956	0.003 ( +0.2% )
TTbar MC 94X2016	1.747	1.744	0.002 ( +0.1% )
TTbar MC 80X	1.903	1.902	0.001 ( +0.0% )
Data 102X	0.971	0.962	0.009 ( +0.9% )
Data 94Xv1	0.918	0.914	0.004 ( +0.4% )
Data 80X	0.794	0.793	0.001 ( +0.1% )
Data 80X, Mu Run2016E	0.776	0.775	0.001 ( +0.1% )