Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request JuliaLang#35300 from JuliaLang/vc/llvm8_pflege
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
[LLVM8] add patches for D75072 and D65174
  • Loading branch information
vchuravy authored Mar 30, 2020
2 parents 5dd6676 + d20184f commit 72d7341
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 536 additions and 1 deletion.
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion deps/llvm.mk
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -392,7 +392,8 @@ $(eval $(call LLVM_PATCH,llvm-8.0-D59389-refactor-wmma)) # remove for 9.0
$(eval $(call LLVM_PATCH,llvm-8.0-D59393-mma-ptx63-fix)) # remove for 9.0
$(eval $(call LLVM_PATCH,llvm-8.0-D66657-codegen-degenerate)) # remove for 10.0
$(eval $(call LLVM_PATCH,llvm-8.0-D71495-vectorize-freduce)) # remove for 10.0
# $(eval $(call LLVM_PATCH,llvm-8.0-D65174-limit-merge-stores)) # remove for 10.0
$(eval $(call LLVM_PATCH,llvm-8.0-D75072-SCEV-add-type))
$(eval $(call LLVM_PATCH,llvm-8.0-D65174-limit-merge-stores)) # remove for 10.0
endif # LLVM_VER 8.0

ifeq ($(LLVM_VER_SHORT),9.0)
Expand Down
119 changes: 119 additions & 0 deletions deps/patches/llvm-8.0-D65174-limit-merge-stores.patch
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
From 19992a8c7f2df2000ea7fd4a284ec7b407400fb0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wei Mi <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2020 17:14:12 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [DAGCombine] Limit the number of times for the same store and
root nodes to bail out in store merging dependence check.

We run into a case where dependence check in store merging bail out many times
for the same store and root nodes in a huge basicblock. That increases compile
time by almost 100x. The patch add a map to track how many times the bailing
out happen for the same store and root, and if it is over a limit, stop
considering the store with the same root as a merging candidate.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65174
---
llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp | 45 +++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
index 6af01423ca1..9c7e37d6945 100644
--- llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
+++ llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
@@ -112,6 +112,11 @@ static cl::opt<bool>
MaySplitLoadIndex("combiner-split-load-index", cl::Hidden, cl::init(true),
cl::desc("DAG combiner may split indexing from loads"));

+static cl::opt<unsigned> StoreMergeDependenceLimit(
+ "combiner-store-merge-dependence-limit", cl::Hidden, cl::init(10),
+ cl::desc("Limit the number of times for the same StoreNode and RootNode "
+ "to bail out in store merging dependence check"));
+
namespace {

class DAGCombiner {
@@ -145,6 +150,14 @@ namespace {
/// which have not yet been combined to the worklist.
SmallPtrSet<SDNode *, 32> CombinedNodes;

+ /// Map from candidate StoreNode to the pair of RootNode and count.
+ /// The count is used to track how many times we have seen the StoreNode
+ /// with the same RootNode bail out in dependence check. If we have seen
+ /// the bail out for the same pair many times over a limit, we won't
+ /// consider the StoreNode with the same RootNode as store merging
+ /// candidate again.
+ DenseMap<SDNode *, std::pair<SDNode *, unsigned>> StoreRootCountMap;
+
// AA - Used for DAG load/store alias analysis.
AliasAnalysis *AA;

@@ -190,6 +203,7 @@ namespace {
/// Remove all instances of N from the worklist.
void removeFromWorklist(SDNode *N) {
CombinedNodes.erase(N);
+ StoreRootCountMap.erase(N);

auto It = WorklistMap.find(N);
if (It == WorklistMap.end())
@@ -14423,6 +14437,18 @@ void DAGCombiner::getStoreMergeCandidates(
return (BasePtr.equalBaseIndex(Ptr, DAG, Offset));
};

+ // Check if the pair of StoreNode and the RootNode already bail out many
+ // times which is over the limit in dependence check.
+ auto OverLimitInDependenceCheck = [&](SDNode *StoreNode,
+ SDNode *RootNode) -> bool {
+ auto RootCount = StoreRootCountMap.find(StoreNode);
+ if (RootCount != StoreRootCountMap.end() &&
+ RootCount->second.first == RootNode &&
+ RootCount->second.second > StoreMergeDependenceLimit)
+ return true;
+ return false;
+ };
+
// We looking for a root node which is an ancestor to all mergable
// stores. We search up through a load, to our root and then down
// through all children. For instance we will find Store{1,2,3} if
@@ -14450,7 +14476,8 @@ void DAGCombiner::getStoreMergeCandidates(
if (StoreSDNode *OtherST = dyn_cast<StoreSDNode>(*I2)) {
BaseIndexOffset Ptr;
int64_t PtrDiff;
- if (CandidateMatch(OtherST, Ptr, PtrDiff))
+ if (CandidateMatch(OtherST, Ptr, PtrDiff) &&
+ !OverLimitInDependenceCheck(OtherST, RootNode))
StoreNodes.push_back(MemOpLink(OtherST, PtrDiff));
}
} else
@@ -14459,7 +14486,8 @@ void DAGCombiner::getStoreMergeCandidates(
if (StoreSDNode *OtherST = dyn_cast<StoreSDNode>(*I)) {
BaseIndexOffset Ptr;
int64_t PtrDiff;
- if (CandidateMatch(OtherST, Ptr, PtrDiff))
+ if (CandidateMatch(OtherST, Ptr, PtrDiff) &&
+ !OverLimitInDependenceCheck(OtherST, RootNode))
StoreNodes.push_back(MemOpLink(OtherST, PtrDiff));
}
}
@@ -14517,8 +14545,19 @@ bool DAGCombiner::checkMergeStoreCandidatesForDependencies(
// Search through DAG. We can stop early if we find a store node.
for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumStores; ++i)
if (SDNode::hasPredecessorHelper(StoreNodes[i].MemNode, Visited, Worklist,
- Max))
+ Max)) {
+ // If the searching bail out, record the StoreNode and RootNode in the
+ // StoreRootCountMap. If we have seen the pair many times over a limit,
+ // we won't add the StoreNode into StoreNodes set again.
+ if (Visited.size() >= Max) {
+ auto &RootCount = StoreRootCountMap[StoreNodes[i].MemNode];
+ if (RootCount.first == RootNode)
+ RootCount.second++;
+ else
+ RootCount = {RootNode, 1};
+ }
return false;
+ }
return true;
}

--
2.25.2

Loading

0 comments on commit 72d7341

Please sign in to comment.