Add optional reviewers and bots github teams

... per WG area

toc/rfc/rfc-0005-github-teams-and-access.md → toc/rfc/archived/rfc-0005-github-teams-and-access.md

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 - Name: Standardizing Github Teams and Access
 - Start Date: 2022-02-28
 - Author(s): @ameowlia
-- Status: Accepted
+- Status: Superseded by [community#375](https://github.com/cloudfoundry/community/pull/375)
 - RFC Pull Request: [community#170](https://github.com/cloudfoundry/community/pull/170)
 
 

toc/rfc/rfc-draft-github-teams-and-access.md

@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+# Meta
+[meta]: #meta
+- Name: Standardizing Github Teams and Access
+- Start Date: 2022-07-28
+- Author(s): @ameowlia, @stephanme
+- Status: Draft
+- RFC Pull Request: [community#375](https://github.com/cloudfoundry/community/pull/375)
+
+
+## Summary
+
+All working groups SHOULD create GitHub teams using the standardized name format.
+
+Supersedes [rfc-0005-github-teams-and-access](https://github.com/cloudfoundry/community/blob/main/toc/rfc/archived/rfc-0005-github-teams-and-access.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+CFF technical governance has changed to be organized around working groups and
+new roles like Tech Lead and Approver. Most working groups also have sub-groups.
+
+We need ways within the community to:
+* Provide the team members with proper push access to certain repos,
+* Provide a way for others to tag groups of people.
+
+## Proposal
+
+Every working group SHOULD use GitHub teams within the `cloudfoundry` org to reflect the following groups. The GitHub teams SHOULD be provisioned
+automatically from the yaml blocks in the working group charters.
+
+| Name of Team  | Team Membership  | Permissions  |
+|---|---|---|
+| toc | Technical Oversight Committee | Admin access to everything |
+| wg-leads | Tech and Execution Leads for all WGs | Write access to community repo |
+| wg-[WORKING-GROUP-NAME] | All approvers and leads for a WG | None: only for organization and tagging |
+| wg-[WORKING-GROUP-NAME]-leads | All leads for a WG | Admin access for all WG repos |
+| wg-[WORKING-GROUP-NAME]-bots | Bot accounts for a WG | Write access for all WG repos |
+| wg-[WORKING-GROUP-NAME]-[AREA-NAME]-approvers | Approvers & tech leads for an area within a WG | Write access for all repos in the area |
+| wg-[WORKING-GROUP-NAME]-[AREA-NAME]-reviewers | Contributors who want to become approver for an area within a WG | Read access for all repos in the area, so that PRs can be assigned for review |
+| wg-[WORKING-GROUP-NAME]-[AREA-NAME]-bots | Bot accounts for an area within a WG | Write access for all repos in the area |
+
+Where: 
+* `WORKING-GROUP-NAME` is the name of the Working Group, converted to kebab case,
+* `AREA-NAME` is the name of the area, also converted to kebab case, or a suitable short name that identifies it clearly and uniquely within the Working Group.