Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ui-storagebrowser] fixes the preview for non-text files #3981

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ramprasadagarwal
Copy link
Collaborator

@ramprasadagarwal ramprasadagarwal commented Feb 1, 2025

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

  • When a file with an unsupported extension (e.g., Dockerfile) was opened in the file browser, a message indicating "unsupported file type" was shown, which prevented users from viewing the content of the file, even if it contained readable text.
  • Fix: Adjusted the logic to allow users to view the file content, regardless of unsupported extensions, if the file contains readable text.

How was this patch tested?

  • Updated the unit tests

Please review Hue Contributing Guide before opening a pull request.

@ramprasadagarwal ramprasadagarwal self-assigned this Feb 1, 2025
@@ -295,18 +305,18 @@ describe('StorageFilePage', () => {
expect(video.children[0]).toHaveAttribute('src', expect.stringContaining('videofile.mp4'));
});

it('should display a message for unsupported file types', () => {
it('should display a message for compresed file types', () => {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: spelling

@@ -230,15 +230,25 @@ describe('StorageFilePage', () => {
expect(screen.queryByRole('link', { name: 'Download' })).toBeNull();
});

// TODO: fix this test when mocking of useLoadData onSuccess callback is mproperly mocked
it.skip('should render a textarea for text files', () => {
// TODO: fix this test when mocking of useLoadData onSuccess callback is properly mocked
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why don't we mock this now?

const fileExtension = fileName?.split('.')?.pop()?.toLowerCase();
if (!fileExtension) {
return SupportedFileTypes.OTHER;
for (const fileExtension in SUPPORTED_FILE_EXTENSIONS) {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why did you remove the split on "." lower case transformation? This seems less robust given that this function still receives the complete file name.

A file called "testpng" and that is lacking a proper file type will now be assumed to be a png file just because it has it in the name at the end. Also "test.PNG" which should be matched won't be matched.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants