Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 6, 2020. It is now read-only.

failed to run posix filesystem conformance test #828

Open
devimc opened this issue Nov 24, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

failed to run posix filesystem conformance test #828

devimc opened this issue Nov 24, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@devimc
Copy link

devimc commented Nov 24, 2017

Description of problem

failed to run posix filesystem conformance test [1] in a container

Expected result

   Result: SUCCESS

Actual result

   Test Summary Report
   -------------------
   /pjd-fstest/tests/link/00.t     (Wstat: 0 Tests: 82 Failed: 4)
     Failed tests:  57-58, 64-65
   /pjd-fstest/tests/mkdir/00.t    (Wstat: 0 Tests: 36 Failed: 2)
     Failed tests:  33-34
   /pjd-fstest/tests/mkfifo/00.t   (Wstat: 0 Tests: 36 Failed: 2)
     Failed tests:  33-34
   /pjd-fstest/tests/mknod/00.t    (Wstat: 0 Tests: 36 Failed: 2)
     Failed tests:  33-34
   /pjd-fstest/tests/mknod/03.t    (Wstat: 0 Tests: 12 Failed: 9)
     Failed tests:  1-3, 5-7, 9-11
   /pjd-fstest/tests/mknod/11.t    (Wstat: 0 Tests: 28 Failed: 4)
     Failed tests:  12-13, 25-26
   /pjd-fstest/tests/open/00.t     (Wstat: 0 Tests: 47 Failed: 2)
     Failed tests:  33-34
   /pjd-fstest/tests/xacl/01.t     (Wstat: 0 Tests: 32 Failed: 10)
     Failed tests:  10, 13, 17, 20, 22, 25, 27-28, 30, 32
   /pjd-fstest/tests/xacl/02.t     (Wstat: 0 Tests: 80 Failed: 19)
     Failed tests:  9, 12, 15, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 47
                   50, 55, 59, 63, 67, 71, 75, 80
   /pjd-fstest/tests/xacl/03.t     (Wstat: 0 Tests: 57 Failed: 21)
     Failed tests:  9, 14, 18, 22-28, 34, 37, 42, 46, 50-56
   /pjd-fstest/tests/xacl/04.t     (Wstat: 0 Tests: 53 Failed: 10)
     Failed tests:  8, 10, 16, 18, 25, 29, 31, 38, 41, 43
   /pjd-fstest/tests/xacl/05.t     (Wstat: 0 Tests: 21 Failed: 2)
     Failed tests:  9, 12
   /pjd-fstest/tests/xacl/06.t     (Wstat: 0 Tests: 42 Failed: 4)
     Failed tests:  9, 12, 20, 25
   Files=210, Tests=2651, 89 wallclock secs ( 0.64 usr  0.27 sys +  6.78 cusr 10.78 csys = 18.47 CPU)
   Result: FAIL
   fstest

[1] - https://sourceforge.net/p/ntfs-3g/pjd-fstest/ci/master/tree/

@grahamwhaley
Copy link
Contributor

Good report.
I'll note that I just ran this with 'runc', and I see 2 failures there as well (in the xacl tests, which I'm guessing are access control - maybe there is a docker setting to enable that etc.).
I'll also note, maybe we can try out this test as well:
http://posixtest.sourceforge.net/
which is available as a package (in ubuntu at least) already - it may be old, but it may be worth a spin.

I'll note, we fail quite a few more than the 2 xacl failures...

mcastelino pushed a commit to mcastelino/runtime that referenced this issue Dec 6, 2018
newContainer: Not attach device if it is a CDROM
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants