Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Text with attribute in an exception marker is missing cursor: text #6272

Closed
Mgsy opened this issue Feb 14, 2020 · 3 comments Β· Fixed by ckeditor/ckeditor5-theme-lark#267
Closed
Assignees
Labels
type:bug This issue reports a buggy (incorrect) behavior.

Comments

@Mgsy
Copy link
Member

Mgsy commented Feb 14, 2020

πŸ“ Provide detailed reproduction steps (if any)

  1. Put the caret in an exception marker.
  2. Insert some styled text, i.e. with bold.
  3. Hover it.

βœ”οΈ Expected result

The cursor displays as text.

❌ Actual result

The cursor displays as default.

πŸ“ƒ Other details

GIF
bug_cke5


If you'd like to see this fixed sooner, add a πŸ‘ reaction to this post.

@Mgsy Mgsy added the type:bug This issue reports a buggy (incorrect) behavior. label Feb 14, 2020
@Reinmar
Copy link
Member

Reinmar commented Feb 14, 2020

cc @panr

@Mgsy Mgsy added this to the backlog milestone Feb 18, 2020
@panr
Copy link
Contributor

panr commented Feb 18, 2020

Probably bold has some other styles that override our latest changes... I will take a look at this πŸ‘

@panr
Copy link
Contributor

panr commented Feb 25, 2020

PR is ready to check. I refactored code for styling as well.

Reinmar added a commit to ckeditor/ckeditor5-theme-lark that referenced this issue Feb 26, 2020
Fix: Pointer inside the restricted editing exception should be set to text for all children. Closes ckeditor/ckeditor5#6272.
@Reinmar Reinmar modified the milestones: backlog, iteration 30 Feb 26, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type:bug This issue reports a buggy (incorrect) behavior.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants