Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 26, 2020. It is now read-only.

I/6110: Change name LabeledView -> LabeledFieldView #547

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Mar 26, 2020
Merged

I/6110: Change name LabeledView -> LabeledFieldView #547

merged 13 commits into from
Mar 26, 2020

Conversation

panr
Copy link
Contributor

@panr panr commented Mar 20, 2020

Suggested merge commit message (convention)

Other: Changed the name of the LabeledView component to the LabeledFieldView. See ckeditor/ckeditor5#6110.

Related PR: ckeditor/ckeditor5-theme-lark#274

--

BREAKING CHANGES:

  • From now the instance of a labeled component's view is available through LabeledFieldView#field. It replaced LabeledView#view.

@panr
Copy link
Contributor Author

panr commented Mar 20, 2020

FYI: CI breaks due to the fact that I used console.warn.

@panr
Copy link
Contributor Author

panr commented Mar 23, 2020

I'm struggling with CI. Tried almost everything... What I'm missing? 🤔
I moved this part of code to related PR — #549

…ponent.

The changes will appear in a separate PR.
Copy link
Contributor

@jodator jodator left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor thing - keep properties names withing class consistently. As other names are somethingView the #filed should be #fieldView.

src/labeledfieldview/labeledfieldview.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/labeledfieldview/labeledfieldview.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@panr
Copy link
Contributor Author

panr commented Mar 25, 2020

@jodator all done ✅🤞

Copy link
Contributor

@jodator jodator left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍

@jodator jodator merged commit 5a7aca7 into master Mar 26, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants