Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[NFC] test fix for leap year #29515

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 27, 2024
Merged

[NFC] test fix for leap year #29515

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 27, 2024

Conversation

demeritcowboy
Copy link
Contributor

Overview

test fails on Feb 26 in leap years.

Copy link

civibot bot commented Feb 26, 2024

🤖 Thank you for contributing to CiviCRM! ❤️ We will need to test and review this PR. 👷

Introduction for new contributors...
  • If this is your first PR, an admin will greenlight automated testing with the command ok to test or add to whitelist.
  • A series of tests will automatically run. You can see the results at the bottom of this page (if there are any problems, it will include a link to see what went wrong).
  • A demo site will be built where anyone can try out a version of CiviCRM that includes your changes.
  • If this process needs to be repeated, an admin will issue the command test this please to rerun tests and build a new demo site.
  • Before this PR can be merged, it needs to be reviewed. Please keep in mind that reviewers are volunteers, and their response time can vary from a few hours to a few weeks depending on their availability and their knowledge of this particular part of CiviCRM.
  • A great way to speed up this process is to "trade reviews" with someone - find an open PR that you feel able to review, and leave a comment like "I'm reviewing this now, could you please review mine?" (include a link to yours). You don't have to wait for a response to get started (and you don't have to stop at one!) the more you review, the faster this process goes for everyone 😄
  • To ensure that you are credited properly in the final release notes, please add yourself to contributor-key.yml
  • For more information about contributing, see CONTRIBUTING.md.
Quick links for reviewers...

➡️ Online demo of this PR 🔗

@eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor

I believe in fact the tests fail on Feb 27 on leap years....

image

@demeritcowboy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oh yes, probably every day between feb 26 and feb 28. Ok let me get my time machine and rejig.

@demeritcowboy
Copy link
Contributor Author

The feb 29 I couldn't do in my head. But it can be confirmed by seeing that:

php -r "echo date('Y-m-d', strtotime('2024-02-29 - 2 year + 3 day'));" gives 2022-03-04

and

SELECT DATEDIFF(
        IF(
            DATE(CONCAT(YEAR('2024-02-29'), '-', MONTH('2022-03-04'), '-', DAY('2022-03-04'))) < '2024-02-29',
            CONCAT(YEAR('2024-02-29') + 1, '-', MONTH('2022-03-04'), '-', DAY('2022-03-04')),
            CONCAT(YEAR('2024-02-29'), '-', MONTH('2022-03-04'), '-', DAY('2022-03-04'))
        ),
        '2024-02-29'
    );

returns 4

@demeritcowboy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ah I should put this against 5.71, otherwise tests on backports will fail for a few days.

@demeritcowboy demeritcowboy changed the base branch from master to 5.71 February 26, 2024 23:49
@civibot civibot bot added 5.71 and removed master labels Feb 26, 2024
@demeritcowboy demeritcowboy merged commit 71bf6eb into civicrm:5.71 Feb 27, 2024
3 checks passed
@demeritcowboy demeritcowboy deleted the leap branch February 27, 2024 00:27
@eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor

Happy 29th of Feb

@demeritcowboy
Copy link
Contributor Author

I still can't get over how you're living in the future.

I think I'm going to propose to the [insert whatever org controls time] that individual regions be allowed to regulate if they want leap years, since our time systems are too simple with just timezones and DST.

@eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor

shame it doesn't allow me to tell you who will win lotto

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants