Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix master-only regression on saving event info when no custom data applies #29301

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2024

Conversation

eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor

@eileenmcnaughton eileenmcnaughton commented Feb 7, 2024

Overview

Fix master-only regression on saving event info when no custom data applies

Before

Event Info not saving when there are no custom fields extending event

After

now it does

Technical Details

I didn't see this before as I had a tonne of custom data locally but after re-building my site I hit it

I'm pretty sure this is the same issue as @demeritcowboy reported in https://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/-/issues/4968
and the reason why I couldn't replicate that would have been the same

Comments

Copy link

civibot bot commented Feb 7, 2024

🤖 Thank you for contributing to CiviCRM! ❤️ We will need to test and review this PR. 👷

Introduction for new contributors...
  • If this is your first PR, an admin will greenlight automated testing with the command ok to test or add to whitelist.
  • A series of tests will automatically run. You can see the results at the bottom of this page (if there are any problems, it will include a link to see what went wrong).
  • A demo site will be built where anyone can try out a version of CiviCRM that includes your changes.
  • If this process needs to be repeated, an admin will issue the command test this please to rerun tests and build a new demo site.
  • Before this PR can be merged, it needs to be reviewed. Please keep in mind that reviewers are volunteers, and their response time can vary from a few hours to a few weeks depending on their availability and their knowledge of this particular part of CiviCRM.
  • A great way to speed up this process is to "trade reviews" with someone - find an open PR that you feel able to review, and leave a comment like "I'm reviewing this now, could you please review mine?" (include a link to yours). You don't have to wait for a response to get started (and you don't have to stop at one!) the more you review, the faster this process goes for everyone 😄
  • To ensure that you are credited properly in the final release notes, please add yourself to contributor-key.yml
  • For more information about contributing, see CONTRIBUTING.md.
Quick links for reviewers...

➡️ Online demo of this PR 🔗

@demeritcowboy
Copy link
Contributor

Ahhh good find.

@eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor Author

@demeritcowboy thank @colemanw - he is the one who added a new field, forcing me to either run the upgrade script or run civibuild create....

@demeritcowboy demeritcowboy merged commit b9c5279 into civicrm:master Feb 7, 2024
3 checks passed
@colemanw colemanw deleted the event_online branch February 7, 2024 18:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants