Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dev/core#4836 Fix mishandling of multiple fields with serialize #29116

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 28, 2024

Conversation

eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor

Overview

dev/core#4836 Fix mishandling of multiple fields with serialize

Before

See https://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/-/issues/4836

After

Fixed

Technical Details

Comments

Copy link

civibot bot commented Jan 27, 2024

🤖 Thank you for contributing to CiviCRM! ❤️ We will need to test and review this PR. 👷

Introduction for new contributors...
  • If this is your first PR, an admin will greenlight automated testing with the command ok to test or add to whitelist.
  • A series of tests will automatically run. You can see the results at the bottom of this page (if there are any problems, it will include a link to see what went wrong).
  • A demo site will be built where anyone can try out a version of CiviCRM that includes your changes.
  • If this process needs to be repeated, an admin will issue the command test this please to rerun tests and build a new demo site.
  • Before this PR can be merged, it needs to be reviewed. Please keep in mind that reviewers are volunteers, and their response time can vary from a few hours to a few weeks depending on their availability and their knowledge of this particular part of CiviCRM.
  • A great way to speed up this process is to "trade reviews" with someone - find an open PR that you feel able to review, and leave a comment like "I'm reviewing this now, could you please review mine?" (include a link to yours). You don't have to wait for a response to get started (and you don't have to stop at one!) the more you review, the faster this process goes for everyone 😄
  • To ensure that you are credited properly in the final release notes, please add yourself to contributor-key.yml
  • For more information about contributing, see CONTRIBUTING.md.
Quick links for reviewers...

➡️ Online demo of this PR 🔗

@civibot civibot bot added the master label Jan 27, 2024
Copy link

civibot bot commented Jan 27, 2024

The issue associated with the Pull Request can be viewed at https://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/-/issues/4836

@eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor Author

@colemanw if you feel like tackling

this unit test goes through that code so could cover any changes

Also, I tried going a step further on this & switching to apiv4 but it is failing Authorization even though we aren't mocking a logged in user - that sorta makes sense but I thought tests were chill about checking permissions in that scenario

edad583

@Detsieber
Copy link
Contributor

(CiviCRM Review Template WORD-1.2)

  • General standards
    • (r-explain) Pass
    • (r-user) _Pass: Bugfix, now works as expected
    • (r-doc) Pass
    • (r-run) Pass: Test for different combinations of multivalue and normal fields
  • Developer standards

@colemanw
Copy link
Member

@eileenmcnaughton Ok. #29124

@colemanw colemanw merged commit 0425e78 into civicrm:master Jan 28, 2024
3 checks passed
@colemanw colemanw deleted the detlev branch January 28, 2024 18:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants