Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SMS Provider searchkit admin ui #28512

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

pradpnayak
Copy link
Contributor

@pradpnayak pradpnayak commented Dec 5, 2023

Overview

SMS Provider search kit for admin UI replacement

Before:
Screenshot 2023-12-05 at 15 52 00

After:
Screenshot 2023-12-05 at 15 52 00

Requires: #28512

Copy link

civibot bot commented Dec 5, 2023

🤖 Thank you for contributing to CiviCRM! ❤️ We will need to test and review this PR. 👷

Introduction for new contributors...
  • If this is your first PR, an admin will greenlight automated testing with the command ok to test or add to whitelist.
  • A series of tests will automatically run. You can see the results at the bottom of this page (if there are any problems, it will include a link to see what went wrong).
  • A demo site will be built where anyone can try out a version of CiviCRM that includes your changes.
  • If this process needs to be repeated, an admin will issue the command test this please to rerun tests and build a new demo site.
  • Before this PR can be merged, it needs to be reviewed. Please keep in mind that reviewers are volunteers, and their response time can vary from a few hours to a few weeks depending on their availability and their knowledge of this particular part of CiviCRM.
  • A great way to speed up this process is to "trade reviews" with someone - find an open PR that you feel able to review, and leave a comment like "I'm reviewing this now, could you please review mine?" (include a link to yours). You don't have to wait for a response to get started (and you don't have to stop at one!) the more you review, the faster this process goes for everyone 😄
  • To ensure that you are credited properly in the final release notes, please add yourself to contributor-key.yml
  • For more information about contributing, see CONTRIBUTING.md.
Quick links for reviewers...

➡️ Online demo of this PR 🔗

@civibot civibot bot added the master label Dec 5, 2023
@colemanw
Copy link
Member

colemanw commented Dec 5, 2023

@pradpnayak looks good. I've merged the API entity PR. Can you update your 2nd screenshot?

'style' => 'default',
'path' => '',
'action' => '',
'condition' => [],
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
'condition' => [],
'condition' => ['is_active', '=', FALSE],

'style' => 'default',
'path' => '',
'action' => '',
'condition' => [],
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
'condition' => [],
'condition' => ['is_active', '=', TRUE],

'version' => 4,
'values' => [
'name' => 'SMS_Provider_Table_1',
'label' => E::ts('SMS Provider Table 1'),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
'label' => E::ts('SMS Provider Table 1'),
'label' => E::ts('SMS Provider'),

@colemanw
Copy link
Member

@pradpnayak can you check the above suggestions?

'values' => [
'name' => 'SMS_Provider',
'label' => E::ts('SMS Provider'),
'api_entity' => 'Provider',
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Per #29555 this will need to be changed to

Suggested change
'api_entity' => 'Provider',
'api_entity' => 'SmsProvider',

@samuelsov
Copy link
Contributor

Closing in profit of #29567

@samuelsov samuelsov closed this Mar 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants