Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[REF] Remove unreachable handling #27192

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 29, 2023

Conversation

eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor

generatePane is only called from one function & those calls have either AdditionalDetail or Premium as the type - the rest of the handling in the function apparently relates to before we used the payment form load method (a long time ago)

generatePane is only called from one function & those calls have either AdditionalDetail
or Premium as the type - the rest of the handling in the function
apparently relates to before we used the payment form load method (a long time ago)

if ($dao->find(TRUE) && empty($this->_payNow)) {
$paneNames[ts('Premium Information')] = 'Premium';
if ($dao->find(TRUE)) {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the payNow check is removed as I moved it inside the relevant IF

@civibot
Copy link

civibot bot commented Aug 29, 2023

🤖 Thank you for contributing to CiviCRM! ❤️ We will need to test and review this PR. 👷

Introduction for new contributors...
  • If this is your first PR, an admin will greenlight automated testing with the command ok to test or add to whitelist.
  • A series of tests will automatically run. You can see the results at the bottom of this page (if there are any problems, it will include a link to see what went wrong).
  • A demo site will be built where anyone can try out a version of CiviCRM that includes your changes.
  • If this process needs to be repeated, an admin will issue the command test this please to rerun tests and build a new demo site.
  • Before this PR can be merged, it needs to be reviewed. Please keep in mind that reviewers are volunteers, and their response time can vary from a few hours to a few weeks depending on their availability and their knowledge of this particular part of CiviCRM.
  • A great way to speed up this process is to "trade reviews" with someone - find an open PR that you feel able to review, and leave a comment like "I'm reviewing this now, could you please review mine?" (include a link to yours). You don't have to wait for a response to get started (and you don't have to stop at one!) the more you review, the faster this process goes for everyone 😄
  • To ensure that you are credited properly in the final release notes, please add yourself to contributor-key.yml
  • For more information about contributing, see CONTRIBUTING.md.
Quick links for reviewers...

➡️ Online demo of this PR 🔗

@civibot civibot bot added the master label Aug 29, 2023
eileenmcnaughton added a commit to eileenmcnaughton/civicrm-core that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2023
Per civicrm#27192

hidden_CreditCard is always empty so the check is meaningless.

The newer boolean token check is safer than the quoted string check
@eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor Author

fail looks leap-year related - I think it might be failing all day

@eileenmcnaughton eileenmcnaughton merged commit bb49a5d into civicrm:master Aug 29, 2023
@eileenmcnaughton eileenmcnaughton deleted the hidden branch August 29, 2023 04:22
larssandergreen pushed a commit to larssandergreen/civicrm-core that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2023
Per civicrm#27192

hidden_CreditCard is always empty so the check is meaningless.

The newer boolean token check is safer than the quoted string check
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants