Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Undefined property fix #27148

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 25, 2023
Merged

Undefined property fix #27148

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 25, 2023

Conversation

eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor

@eileenmcnaughton eileenmcnaughton commented Aug 24, 2023

This removes interaction with an undefined property which actually only tells us if eventId is in the url. The property is only accessed in preProcess, buildForm & setDefaultValues - ie when the GET is populated because this overload use case is only for ajax loading of fees - so we can just keep checking _GET and not set a property

This removes interaction with an undefined property which actually only
tells us if eventId is in the url. The property is only accessed
in preProcess, buildForm & setDefaultValues - ie when the GET is
populated because this overload use case is only for ajax
loading of fees - so we can just keep checking _GET and
not set a property
@civibot
Copy link

civibot bot commented Aug 24, 2023

Thank you for contributing to CiviCRM! ❤️ We will need to test and review the PR. 👷

Introduction for new contributors
  • If this is your first PR, an admin will greenlight automated testing with the command ok to test or add to whitelist.
  • A series of tests will automatically run. You can see the results at the bottom of this page (if there are any problems, it will include a link to see what went wrong).
  • A demo site will be built where anyone can try out a version of CiviCRM that includes your changes.
  • If this process needs to be repeated, an admin will issue the command test this please to rerun tests and build a new demo site.
  • Before this PR can be merged, it needs to be reviewed. Please keep in mind that reviewers are volunteers, and their response time can vary from a few hours to a few weeks depending on their availability and their knowledge of this particular part of CiviCRM.
  • A great way to speed up this process is to "trade reviews" with someone - find an open PR that you feel able to review, and leave a comment like "I'm reviewing this now, could you please review mine?" (include a link to yours). You don't have to wait for a response to get started (and you don't have to stop at one!) the more you review, the faster this process goes for everyone 😄
  • To ensure that you are credited properly in the final release notes, please add yourself to contributor-key.yml
  • For more information about contributing, see CONTRIBUTING.md.
Quick links for reviewers

@civibot civibot bot added the master label Aug 24, 2023
@yashodha
Copy link
Contributor

@eileenmcnaughton looks good, merging this PR.

@yashodha yashodha merged commit 3a85b8d into civicrm:master Aug 25, 2023
@eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor Author

thanks @yashodha

@eileenmcnaughton eileenmcnaughton deleted the fee_block branch August 25, 2023 05:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants