Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove old broken code #26914

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 24, 2023
Merged

Remove old broken code #26914

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 24, 2023

Conversation

eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor

@eileenmcnaughton eileenmcnaughton commented Jul 24, 2023

Overview

Remove old broken code

This code is

  1. passing a non variable to a pass by reference
  2. accessing a non-existant never-set property (_honoreeProfileId)

I think it is likely this code has been broken since 2014 but it's really obscure & hence probably never hit.

To hit this code it is necessary to attempt to add a pledge payment to an existing pledge via a contribution page by putting the pledgeId in the url along with the contact ID (e.g https://dmaster.localhost:32353/civicrm/contribute/transact?reset=1&id=3&pledgeId=4&cid=204). However, the pledge MUST HAVE existing completed payment/s AND at least one of those MUST have a soft credit. I hacked out the checksum lookup to get past that

Note there are multiple reasons why this might not work on your site if you try to test it - it looks up the wrong option group set to get valid statuses for example. But the worst that could happen is that a default value is not set in a very very obscure place

Before

image

image

After

poof

image

Technical Details

Comments

@civibot
Copy link

civibot bot commented Jul 24, 2023

Thank you for contributing to CiviCRM! ❤️ We will need to test and review the PR. 👷

Introduction for new contributors
  • If this is your first PR, an admin will greenlight automated testing with the command ok to test or add to whitelist.
  • A series of tests will automatically run. You can see the results at the bottom of this page (if there are any problems, it will include a link to see what went wrong).
  • A demo site will be built where anyone can try out a version of CiviCRM that includes your changes.
  • If this process needs to be repeated, an admin will issue the command test this please to rerun tests and build a new demo site.
  • Before this PR can be merged, it needs to be reviewed. Please keep in mind that reviewers are volunteers, and their response time can vary from a few hours to a few weeks depending on their availability and their knowledge of this particular part of CiviCRM.
  • A great way to speed up this process is to "trade reviews" with someone - find an open PR that you feel able to review, and leave a comment like "I'm reviewing this now, could you please review mine?" (include a link to yours). You don't have to wait for a response to get started (and you don't have to stop at one!) the more you review, the faster this process goes for everyone 😄
  • To ensure that you are credited properly in the final release notes, please add yourself to contributor-key.yml
  • For more information about contributing, see CONTRIBUTING.md.
Quick links for reviewers

@civibot civibot bot added the master label Jul 24, 2023
@eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor Author

test this please

@colemanw
Copy link
Member

Nice catch @eileenmcnaughton

@colemanw colemanw merged commit 4a6f3a0 into civicrm:master Jul 24, 2023
@colemanw colemanw deleted the mem_amount branch July 24, 2023 10:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants