Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dev/core#711 remove Google+ #16099

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 2, 2020
Merged

Conversation

agileware-pengyi
Copy link
Contributor

Overview

I am trying to push this forward, so here is PR for removing Google+ icon from the social network template.

Before

Google+ reference included

After

Google+ reference removed

Comments

Agileware ref: CIVICRM-1243

@civibot
Copy link

civibot bot commented Dec 12, 2019

(Standard links)

@civibot civibot bot added the master label Dec 12, 2019
@yashodha
Copy link
Contributor

@agileware-pengyi Is that all the references in the codebase?

@seamuslee001
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like there are references to it in templates/CRM/Contribute/Form/ContributionPage/Settings.hlp xml/templates/civicrm_data.tpl CRM/Dedupe/Merger.php as well there is a reference in CRM/Upgrade/Incremental/sql/4.5.alpha1.mysql.tpl but that should stay IMO

@agileware-pengyi
Copy link
Contributor Author

@seamuslee001 @yashodha I've updated the branch.

@yashodha
Copy link
Contributor

@agileware-pengyi thanks!

@@ -740,7 +740,6 @@ VALUES
(@option_group_id_website, 'Work', 1, 'Work', NULL, 0, 1, 1, NULL, 0, 0, 1, NULL, NULL, NULL),
(@option_group_id_website, 'Main', 2, 'Main', NULL, 0, NULL, 2, NULL, 0, 0, 1, NULL, NULL, NULL),
(@option_group_id_website, 'Facebook', 3, 'Facebook', NULL, 0, NULL, 3, NULL, 0, 0, 1, NULL, NULL, NULL),
(@option_group_id_website, 'Google+', 4, 'Google_', NULL, 0, NULL, 4, NULL, 0, 0, 1, NULL, NULL, NULL),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Upgrade SQL needed to remove this.

1 similar comment
@eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor

I'm going to merge this - the upgrade PR can follow but I don't think it blocks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants