[REF] simple extraction of function to check required fields are present #14961
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
(Standard links)
|
eileenmcnaughton
force-pushed
the
import
branch
from
c1fa499 to
fbb96b1
Compare
eileenmcnaughton
force-pushed
the
import
branch
from
fbb96b1 to
be3c703
Compare
|
test this please |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Overview
Basic function extraction
Before
Harder to read
After
Easier to read
Technical Details
I have a follow up change to make - do not require total amount, financial type if contribution id is present but left out for clean extraction
Comments