-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cirrus run: introduce --lazy-pull flag #517
Conversation
@fkorotkov |
Just cut |
In the meantime I've upgraded the worked so now it should work. |
Seems that the PR didn't make it through yet. |
I thought it got merged. My bad! |
NoCleanup: debugNoCleanup, | ||
|
||
DockerfileImageTemplate: dockerfileImageTemplate, | ||
DockerfileImagePush: dockerfileImagePush, | ||
})) | ||
|
||
// Tart-related options | ||
executorOpts = append(executorOpts, executor.WithTartOptions(options.TartOptions{ | ||
LazyPull: lazyPull || tartLazyPull, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should it also be called EagerPull
for consistency&
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It was called like that before ef89082, where I've changed the meaning so that each newly-initialized TartOptions
struct would reflect the defaults.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should the container option be renamed into LazyPull
then?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See 241da4f.
Resolves #510.