Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes cilium clustermesh disconnect #2185

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2024
Merged

Fixes cilium clustermesh disconnect #2185

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2024

Conversation

littlejo
Copy link
Contributor

cilium clustermesh disconnect never work with helm version:
remote cluster has cluster ID %d out of acceptable range (1-0)

So i fix it.

Copy link
Contributor

@thorn3r thorn3r left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the submission @littlejo! Left a suggestion here on a simpler approach to fixing this bug

clustermesh/clustermesh.go Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@thorn3r thorn3r left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Sorry for the delay, I was away for the holidays.

@littlejo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@thorn3r Do you know why some checks failed?

@thorn3r
Copy link
Contributor

thorn3r commented Jan 10, 2024

@littlejo Looks like the perf tests were moved to their own subcommand in #2168. The GH workflows run on main which have those changes, but your branch doesn't. If you rebase your PR it should fix these failures

@kariya-mitsuru
Copy link

I am eagerly awaiting this fix to be merged, what are the blocking factors?

@littlejo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@thorn3r do you have news about this PR? Thank you.

@thorn3r
Copy link
Contributor

thorn3r commented Jan 30, 2024

Hey @littlejo it looks like your failure is related to this issue, which was fixed here.

Sorry to ask for this again, but can you rebase once more? The upload-artifact action we're using in that workflow was updated to v4.0.0, which included breaking changes. It's now on v4.3.0, which I believe includes resolution for this - but we've also given the artifacts unique names as per the PR I linked above.

@thorn3r thorn3r added the ready-to-merge This PR has passed all tests and received consensus from code owners to merge. label Feb 1, 2024
@michi-covalent michi-covalent merged commit 0b031ca into cilium:main Feb 1, 2024
13 checks passed
@michi-covalent
Copy link
Contributor

this will be included in the upcoming v0.15.22 release 🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge This PR has passed all tests and received consensus from code owners to merge.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants