Remove old github changelog generator #1530
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm generally +1 for this, but we should check with @stevendanna and @marcparadise to make sure there isn't some reason to keep it I'm missing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is fine by me. I haven't looked recently at the kind of changelogs that expeditor produces, but my leaning is that there is more value in being in line with other projects than maintaining our own changelog scripts.
One thing that we might lose is the omnibus-version changes section of the changelog, but I'm not sure it matters to much.
|
@stevendanna We could probably rig up a similar functionality in the promotion step if we really wanted, but I'd argue that sort of thing should just go in the release notes, which are still human managed. |
|
You might need to kick the travis tests to rerun the failing test. Otherwise you should be able to rebase this and merge. (Please rebase before the merge, it makes things in git visualizers more legible. |
This should all be unused at this point since we bump the changelog with expeditor. Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <[email protected]>
|
Rebase. We'll see now |
This should all be unused at this point since we bump the changelog with expeditor.
Signed-off-by: Tim Smith [email protected]