add microstack as provider #11
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
johnsca
reviewed
Jun 4, 2021
src/bootstrap/index.ts
Outdated
Comment on lines
57
to
63
| await exec.exec(`curl http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/${os_series}/current/${os_series}-server-cloudimg-amd64.img | openstack image create --public --container-format=bare --disk-format=qcow2 ${os_series}`); | ||
| await exec.exec("mkdir /tmp/simplestreams"); | ||
| await exec.exec(`IMAGE_ID=$(openstack image show ${os_series} -f value -c id) && juju metadata generate-image -d /tmp/simplestreams -s ${os_series} -i $IMAGE_ID -r ${os_region} -u http://10.20.20.1:5000/v3`); | ||
| await exec.exec("echo '{clouds: {microstack: {type: openstack, auth-types: [access-key,userpass], regions: {microstack: {endpoint: http://10.20.20.1:5000/v3}}}}}' > /tmp/clouds.json"); | ||
| await exec.exec("juju add-cloud --client microstack -f /tmp/clouds.json"); | ||
| await exec.exec('source /var/snap/microstack/common/etc/microstack.rc && echo "{credentials: {microstack: {$OS_USERNAME: {auth-type: userpass, username: $OS_USERNAME, password: $OS_PASSWORD, project-domain-name: $OS_PROJECT_DOMAIN_NAME, tenant-name: $OS_PROJECT_NAME, user-domain-name: $OS_USER_DOMAIN_NAME, version: \'$OS_IDENTITY_API_VERSION\'}}}}" > /tmp/credentials.json'); | ||
| await exec.exec("juju add-credential microstack -f /tmp/credentials.json --client"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It might be nice to encapsulate these steps into a Juju plugin akin to juju-crashdump or juju-wait, say juju-add-microstack to make it easier for a user to use microstack with Juju locally.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, I like this idea and I reported a bug in the microstack.
rgildein
force-pushed
the
provider/microstack
branch
14 times, most recently
from
7f99d0a to
a97a477
Compare
rgildein
force-pushed
the
provider/microstack
branch
from
a97a477 to
bd800b4
Compare
johnsca
approved these changes
Jun 9, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adding microstack as provider. This will help to run action related to deployment on top of OpenStack cloud.