-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 141
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
README possibly misleading on repository visibility #165
Comments
Good catch @sylph1o! The readme is indeed misleading. Repositories configured as |
Private repos can be accessed by admins and collab users. All other users can read public repos based on the anon-access setting. Fixes: #165
Private repos can be accessed by admins and collab users. All other users can read public repos based on the anon-access setting. Fixes: #165
Thanks for the quick reaction and the clarification! I look forward to trying soft-serve, it looks already very nice, and promising 😃 |
While reading the README for the first time, this comment in the configuration example lead me to believe that any user would be able to see all repositories, i.e. soft-serve manages write access but not read access. That would seriously limit my use for soft-serve, which I find otherwise very interesting.
Exploring further lead me to issue #80, which suggests that a repository configured as
private
is only visible to users who have it theircollab-repos
. That would be the read-access management that I thought was missing. If this is true, then the README is misleading (at least, it misled me), to the detriment of soft-serve.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: