Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: track version history in database #409

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 26, 2024
Merged

Conversation

dav1do
Copy link
Contributor

@dav1do dav1do commented Jul 1, 2024

Very basic right now. Stores the current version in the database at daemon startup. This can be used in the future to prevent downgrades that go across migrations. Related to #382 but split off as we don't need to migrate any data right now.

Copy link

linear bot commented Jul 1, 2024

@dav1do dav1do force-pushed the feat/aes-160-track-version branch from 2ed9b69 to f23f243 Compare July 1, 2024 18:23
@dav1do dav1do requested a review from nathanielc July 1, 2024 18:24
@dav1do dav1do temporarily deployed to github-tests-2024 July 1, 2024 18:37 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@dav1do dav1do temporarily deployed to github-tests-2024 July 1, 2024 19:06 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@dav1do dav1do requested a review from AaronGoldman July 3, 2024 19:13
@stbrody
Copy link
Collaborator

stbrody commented Jul 25, 2024

@dav1do is this still something we want to move forward with getting in place?

dav1do added 2 commits July 25, 2024 15:20
This can be used in the future to prevent downgrades that go across incompatible schema/data migrations
@dav1do dav1do force-pushed the feat/aes-160-track-version branch from 612ed7d to d10803a Compare July 25, 2024 21:23
@dav1do dav1do requested review from a team and stbrody as code owners July 25, 2024 21:23
@dav1do
Copy link
Contributor Author

dav1do commented Jul 25, 2024

@dav1do is this still something we want to move forward with getting in place?

I rebased it as I think it's kind of nice to have, but I don't feel strongly that it's important. The ticket became less necessary as we didn't end up needing to migrate c1 data for GA. We may want this (plus something more like the changes in #382) if we need to make changes to data/schemas for event validation or the conclusion API.

@dav1do dav1do temporarily deployed to github-tests-2024 July 25, 2024 21:34 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@dav1do dav1do added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 26, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit f490f0a Jul 26, 2024
5 checks passed
@dav1do dav1do deleted the feat/aes-160-track-version branch July 26, 2024 21:41
@smrz2001 smrz2001 mentioned this pull request Jul 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants