Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update mocha_versions.js #1765

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2024
Merged

Update mocha_versions.js #1765

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2024

Conversation

mindstyle85
Copy link
Collaborator

@mindstyle85 mindstyle85 commented Oct 23, 2024

Overview

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Updated version tags for Mocha, enhancing compatibility with the latest features.
    • Improved stability with new SHA identifiers for app and node tags.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the mochaVersions constant in the .vitepress/constants/mocha_versions.js file. It specifically modifies the version tags and SHA identifiers for the app-latest-tag and node-latest-tag. The app-latest-tag is changed from "v2.2.0-mocha" to "v2.3.0-mocha", and the corresponding SHA is updated. Similarly, the node-latest-tag is updated from "v0.18.2-mocha" to "v0.18.3-mocha" with its SHA also changed. Other entries in the constant remain unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.vitepress/constants/mocha_versions.js - Updated app-latest-tag from "v2.2.0-mocha" to "v2.3.0-mocha" and SHA from "d3f8b2997fcbc..." to "17a756a20c5b..."
- Updated node-latest-tag from "v0.18.2-mocha" to "v0.18.3-mocha" and SHA from "4309c834985763..." to "395ba5fbfd1cd..."

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • sysrex
  • jcstein

🐰 In the garden, new tags bloom,
Mocha's version sheds old gloom.
With SHA updates, we hop along,
To keep our code both fresh and strong!
🌼✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@mindstyle85 mindstyle85 requested a review from jcstein October 23, 2024 16:54
Copy link
Contributor

PR Preview Action v1.4.8
🚀 Deployed preview to https://celestiaorg.github.io/docs-preview/./pr-1765/
on branch main at 2024-10-23 16:55 UTC

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.vitepress/constants/mocha_versions.js (1)

2-7: Consider documenting version update rationale.

Since the PR description lacks context about these version updates, it would be helpful to document:

  1. The reason for these version bumps
  2. Any breaking changes or important features introduced
  3. The relationship between app and node version updates
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1cc7d97 and cf22232.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .vitepress/constants/mocha_versions.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.vitepress/constants/mocha_versions.js (1)

2-3: Verify app version tag and SHA correspondence.

The app version has been bumped from v2.2.0-mocha to v2.3.0-mocha (minor version update).

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the SHA matches the tag for the app component
# Expected: The SHA should be associated with the v2.3.0-mocha tag

# Test: Check if the SHA exists in the repository
gh api repos/celestiaorg/docs/commits/17a756a20c5b96cc9c5e72fa09a7c0c33cb19f7b --silent || echo "SHA not found"

# Test: Check if the tag exists and points to the correct SHA
gh api repos/celestiaorg/docs/git/refs/tags/v2.3.0-mocha --jq '.object.sha' || echo "Tag not found"

Comment on lines +6 to +7
"node-latest-tag": "v0.18.3-mocha",
"node-latest-sha": "395ba5fbfd1cd7f35ae3c13cf78902612b22c64f",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Version tag and SHA are invalid and need to be updated

Based on the verification results:

  1. The SHA 395ba5fbfd1cd7f35ae3c13cf78902612b22c64f does not exist in the repository
  2. The tag v0.18.3-mocha does not exist in the repository
  3. No references to either the SHA or the version tag were found in the codebase

This indicates that the version tag and SHA in mocha_versions.js are incorrect and need to be updated with valid values that correspond to an actual release or commit in the repository.

🔗 Analysis chain

Verify node version tag and SHA correspondence.

The node version has been bumped from v0.18.2-mocha to v0.18.3-mocha (patch version update).


Let me try to verify this in a different way by checking the repository's tags and commits to get more context.


Let me try one final verification by checking if this version information might be referenced in other configuration files or documentation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the SHA matches the tag for the node component
# Expected: The SHA should be associated with the v0.18.3-mocha tag

# Test: Check if the SHA exists in the repository
gh api repos/celestiaorg/docs/commits/395ba5fbfd1cd7f35ae3c13cf78902612b22c64f --silent || echo "SHA not found"

# Test: Check if the tag exists and points to the correct SHA
gh api repos/celestiaorg/docs/git/refs/tags/v0.18.3-mocha --jq '.object.sha' || echo "Tag not found"

Length of output: 478


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check all available tags in the repository that contain "mocha"
gh api repos/celestiaorg/docs/git/refs/tags --jq '.[].ref' | grep -i mocha || echo "No mocha tags found"

# Let's also check recent commits to see if we can find related changes
gh api repos/celestiaorg/docs/commits --jq '.[].commit.message' | head -n 5

Length of output: 492


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to these versions in the codebase
rg -l "v0.18.3-mocha|395ba5fbfd1cd7f35ae3c13cf78902612b22c64f"

# Check if there are any package.json or similar config files that might reference these versions
fd -e json -e yaml -e yml | xargs rg "0.18.3|395ba5fbfd"

# Look for any documentation files mentioning these versions
fd -e md | xargs rg "v0.18.3-mocha"

Length of output: 159

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants