Test CDRHooks with more rigor

cedarbdd · Apr 14, 2016 · 873eabf · 873eabf
1 parent 82debd2
commit 873eabf
Showing 1 changed file with 55 additions and 11 deletions.
diff --git a/Spec/CDRHooksSpec.mm b/Spec/CDRHooksSpec.mm
@@ -1,8 +1,12 @@
 #import "Cedar.h"
+#import "CDRSpec.h"
+#import "CDRSpecRun.h"
 
 static BOOL conformantClassBeforeEachWasTriggered__ = NO;
+static BOOL conformantClassBeforeEachWasTriggeredBeforeSpecBeforeEach__ = NO;
 static BOOL nonConformantClassBeforeEachWasTriggered__ = NO;
 static BOOL conformantClassAfterEachWasTriggered__ = NO;
+static BOOL conformantClassAfterEachWasTriggeredBeforeSpecAfterEach__ = NO;
 static BOOL nonConformantClassAfterEachWasTriggered__ = NO;
 
 using namespace Cedar::Matchers;
@@ -37,23 +41,63 @@ + (void)afterEach {
 }
 @end
 
-void verifyAfterEachCalledAsExpected() {
-    NSCAssert(conformantClassAfterEachWasTriggered__, @"Expected +[ClassThatConformsToCDRHooks afterEach] to be called, but it wasn't. (From %s)", __FILE__);
-    NSCAssert(!nonConformantClassAfterEachWasTriggered__, @"Expected +[ClassThatDoesntConformToCDRHooks afterEach] to NOT be called, but it was. (From %s)", __FILE__);
+@interface DummySpecForTestingHooks : CDRSpec
+@end
+@implementation DummySpecForTestingHooks                 \
+- (void)declareBehaviors {
+    self.fileName = [NSString stringWithUTF8String:__FILE__];
+    beforeEach(^{
+        conformantClassBeforeEachWasTriggeredBeforeSpecBeforeEach__ = conformantClassBeforeEachWasTriggered__;
+    });
+    it(@"just needs to have a spec", ^{
+    });
+    afterEach(^{
+        conformantClassAfterEachWasTriggeredBeforeSpecAfterEach__ = conformantClassAfterEachWasTriggered__;
+    });
 }
+@end
 
 SPEC_BEGIN(CDRHooksSpec)
 
-describe(@"global beforeEach", ^{
-    it(@"should run the +beforeEach before only for CDRHooks conformant classes", ^{
-        expect(conformantClassBeforeEachWasTriggered__).to(be_truthy);
-        expect(nonConformantClassBeforeEachWasTriggered__).to(be_falsy);
+//NB: If you focus any test here, you must also focus "just needs to run this spec" in DummySpecForTestingHooks
+describe(@"CDRHooks", ^{
+    beforeEach(^{
+        nonConformantClassBeforeEachWasTriggered__ =
+        nonConformantClassAfterEachWasTriggered__ =
+        conformantClassBeforeEachWasTriggered__ =
+        conformantClassBeforeEachWasTriggeredBeforeSpecBeforeEach__ =
+        conformantClassAfterEachWasTriggered__ =
+        conformantClassAfterEachWasTriggeredBeforeSpecAfterEach__ = NO;
+
+        CDRSpec *dummySpec = [[[DummySpecForTestingHooks class] alloc] init];
+        [dummySpec defineBehaviors];
+
+        CDRSpecRun *specRun = [[CDRSpecRun alloc] initWithExampleReporters:@[]];
+        [specRun performSpecRun:^{
+            [dummySpec.rootGroup runWithDispatcher:specRun.dispatcher];
+        }];
     });
-});
 
-describe(@"global afterEach", ^{
-    it(@"should run after all specs", ^{
-        atexit(verifyAfterEachCalledAsExpected);
+    describe(@"+beforeEach", ^{
+        it(@"should not call +beforeEach on non-conformant classes", ^{
+            expect(nonConformantClassBeforeEachWasTriggered__).to(be_falsy);
+        });
+
+        it(@"should run the +beforeEach BEFORE spec beforeEaches for CDRHooks conformers", ^{
+            expect(conformantClassBeforeEachWasTriggered__).to(be_truthy);
+            expect(conformantClassBeforeEachWasTriggeredBeforeSpecBeforeEach__).to(be_truthy);
+        });
+    });
+
+    describe(@"+afterEach", ^{
+        it(@"should not call +afterEach on non-conformant classes", ^{
+            expect(nonConformantClassAfterEachWasTriggered__).to(be_falsy);
+        });
+
+        it(@"should run the +afterEach AFTER spec afterEaches for CDRHooks conformers", ^{
+            expect(conformantClassAfterEachWasTriggered__).to(be_truthy);
+            expect(conformantClassAfterEachWasTriggeredBeforeSpecAfterEach__).to(be_falsy);
+        });
     });
 });