Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replicated MS MARCO passage ranking experiment #41

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 1, 2020
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
22 changes: 11 additions & 11 deletions docs/experiments-msmarco-passage.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ To confirm, `msmarco_ans_small.zip` should have MD5 checksum of `65d8007bfb2c72b
Next, we extract the contents into `data`.

```
unzip msmarco_ans_small.zip -d data
unzip data/msmarco_ans_small.zip -d data
```

As a sanity check, we can evaluate the first-stage retrieved documents using the official MS MARCO evaluation script.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -65,12 +65,12 @@ First, lets evaluate using monoBERT!

```
python -um pygaggle.run.evaluate_passage_ranker --split dev \
--method seq_class_transformer \
--model castorini/monobert-large-msmarco \
--dataset data/msmarco_ans_small/ \
--index-dir indexes/index-msmarco-passage-20191117-0ed488 \
--task msmarco \
--output-file runs/run.monobert.ans_small.dev.tsv
--method seq_class_transformer \
--model castorini/monobert-large-msmarco \
--dataset data/msmarco_ans_small/ \
--index-dir indexes/index-msmarco-passage-20191117-0ed488 \
--task msmarco \
--output-file runs/run.monobert.ans_small.dev.tsv
```

Upon completion, the following output will be visible:
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ If you were able to replicate these results, please submit a PR adding to the re

## Replication Log

+ Results replicated by [@MXueguang](https://github.com/MXueguang) on 2020-05-22(commit [`69de7db`](https://github.com/castorini/pygaggle/commit/69de7db843bbe9201113c4d94c9e90be36094350)) (Tesla P4)
+ Results replicated by [@richard3983](https://github.com/richard3983) on 2020-05-22(commit [`6e9dfc6`](https://github.com/richard3983/pygaggle/commit/6e9dfc62083c15233600c41737110c9989043b98)) (Tesla P100)
+ Results replicated by [@HangCui0510](https://github.com/HangCui0510) on 2020-05-29(commit [`591e7ff`](https://github.com/HangCui0510/pygaggle/commit/591e7ffd6cc826fd2bae5e721f9693452f9e4a49)) (Tesla P100)

+ Results replicated by [@MXueguang](https://github.com/MXueguang) on 2020-05-22 (commit [`69de7db`](https://github.com/castorini/pygaggle/commit/69de7db843bbe9201113c4d94c9e90be36094350)) (Tesla P4)
+ Results replicated by [@richard3983](https://github.com/richard3983) on 2020-05-22 (commit [`6e9dfc6`](https://github.com/richard3983/pygaggle/commit/6e9dfc62083c15233600c41737110c9989043b98)) (Tesla P100)
+ Results replicated by [@HangCui0510](https://github.com/HangCui0510) on 2020-05-29 (commit [`591e7ff`](https://github.com/HangCui0510/pygaggle/commit/591e7ffd6cc826fd2bae5e721f9693452f9e4a49)) (Tesla P100)
+ Results replicated by [@kelvin-jiang](https://github.com/kelvin-jiang) on 2020-05-31 (commit [`82dc086`](https://github.com/HangCui0510/pygaggle/commit/82dc086b86d828147dad34d9a7f8bb66a3c23c88)) (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti)