Revert "Allow matching search path arguments (#1475)"

README.md

@@ -2174,18 +2174,6 @@ $ (cd foo && just a b)
 
 And will both invoke recipes `a` and `b` in `foo/justfile`.
 
-For consistency, it possible to use path prefixes for all recipes:
-
-```sh
-$ just foo/a foo/b
-```
-
-But they must match:
-
-```sh
-$ just foo/a bar/b
-error: Conflicting path arguments: `foo/` and `bar/`
-```
 ### Include Directives
 
 The `!include` directive, currently unstable, can be used to include the

src/config.rs

@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ impl Config {
       }
     }
 
-    let positional = Positional::from_values(matches.values_of(arg::ARGUMENTS))?;
+    let positional = Positional::from_values(matches.values_of(arg::ARGUMENTS));
 
     for (name, value) in positional.overrides {
       overrides.insert(name.clone(), value.clone());

src/config_error.rs

@@ -11,8 +11,6 @@ pub(crate) enum ConfigError {
     message
   ))]
   Internal { message: String },
-  #[snafu(display("Conflicting path arguments: `{}` and `{}`", seen, conflicting))]
-  ConflictingSearchDirArgs { seen: String, conflicting: String },
   #[snafu(display(
     "Path-prefixed recipes may not be used with `--working-directory` or `--justfile`."
   ))]

src/positional.rs

@@ -36,75 +36,41 @@ pub struct Positional {
   pub arguments: Vec<String>,
 }
 
-#[derive(Copy, Clone)]
-enum ProcessingStep {
-  Overrides,
-  SearchDir,
-  Arguments,
-}
-
 impl Positional {
-  pub(crate) fn from_values<'values>(
-    values: Option<impl IntoIterator<Item = &'values str>>,
-  ) -> Result<Self, ConfigError> {
+  pub fn from_values<'values>(values: Option<impl IntoIterator<Item = &'values str>>) -> Self {
     let mut overrides = Vec::new();
     let mut search_directory = None;
     let mut arguments = Vec::new();
 
-    let mut processing_step = ProcessingStep::Overrides;
-
     if let Some(values) = values {
-      let mut values = values.into_iter().peekable();
-      while let Some(value) = values.peek() {
-        let value = *value;
-        match processing_step {
-          ProcessingStep::Overrides => {
-            if let Some(o) = Self::override_from_value(value) {
-              overrides.push(o);
-              values.next();
-            } else {
-              processing_step = ProcessingStep::SearchDir;
-            }
-          }
-          ProcessingStep::SearchDir => {
-            if value == "." || value == ".." {
-              search_directory = Some(value.to_owned());
-              values.next();
-            } else if let Some(i) = value.rfind('/') {
-              let (dir, tail) = value.split_at(i + 1);
-
-              if let Some(ref seen) = search_directory {
-                if seen != dir {
-                  return Err(ConfigError::ConflictingSearchDirArgs {
-                    seen: seen.clone(),
-                    conflicting: dir.into(),
-                  });
-                }
-              } else {
-                search_directory = Some(dir.to_owned());
-              }
-
-              if !tail.is_empty() {
-                arguments.push(tail.to_owned());
-              }
-              values.next();
-            } else {
-              processing_step = ProcessingStep::Arguments;
+      for value in values {
+        if search_directory.is_none() && arguments.is_empty() {
+          if let Some(o) = Self::override_from_value(value) {
+            overrides.push(o);
+          } else if value == "." || value == ".." {
+            search_directory = Some(value.to_owned());
+          } else if let Some(i) = value.rfind('/') {
+            let (dir, tail) = value.split_at(i + 1);
+
+            search_directory = Some(dir.to_owned());
+
+            if !tail.is_empty() {
+              arguments.push(tail.to_owned());
             }
-          }
-          ProcessingStep::Arguments => {
+          } else {
             arguments.push(value.to_owned());
-            values.next();
           }
+        } else {
+          arguments.push(value.to_owned());
         }
       }
     }
 
-    Ok(Self {
+    Self {
       overrides,
       search_directory,
       arguments,
-    })
+    }
   }
 
   /// Parse an override from a value of the form `NAME=.*`.
@@ -141,7 +107,7 @@ mod tests {
       #[test]
       fn $name() {
         assert_eq! (
-          Positional::from_values(Some($vals.iter().cloned())).unwrap(),
+          Positional::from_values(Some($vals.iter().cloned())),
           Positional {
             overrides: $overrides
               .iter()
@@ -259,35 +225,4 @@ mod tests {
     search_directory: None,
     arguments: ["a", "a=b"],
   }
-
-  test! {
-    name: search_dir_and_recipe_only,
-    values: ["some/path/recipe_a"],
-    overrides: [],
-    search_directory: Some("some/path/"),
-    arguments: ["recipe_a"],
-  }
-
-  test! {
-    name: multiple_same_valued_search_directories,
-    values: ["some/path/recipe_a", "some/path/recipe_b"],
-    overrides: [],
-    search_directory: Some("some/path/"),
-    arguments: ["recipe_a", "recipe_b"],
-  }
-
-  #[test]
-  fn invalid_multiple_search_paths() {
-    let err = Positional::from_values(Some(
-      [
-        "some/path/recipe_a",
-        "some/path/recipe_b",
-        "other/path/recipe_c",
-      ]
-      .iter()
-      .copied(),
-    ))
-    .unwrap_err();
-    assert_matches!(err, ConfigError::ConflictingSearchDirArgs { seen, conflicting } if seen == "some/path/" && conflicting == "other/path/");
-  }
 }

tests/search_arguments.rs

@@ -1,77 +1,9 @@
 use super::*;
 
 #[test]
-fn same_path_argument() {
-  let justfile_contents = unindent(
-    r#"
-    recipe_a:
-        echo "A"
-
-    recipe_b:
-        echo "B"
-  "#,
-  );
-  let tmp = temptree! {
-      subdir: {
-          justfile: justfile_contents
-      }
-  };
-
-  for arg_list in [
-    ["subdir/recipe_a", "recipe_b"],
-    ["subdir/recipe_a", "subdir/recipe_b"],
-  ] {
-    let mut command = Command::new(executable_path("just"));
-    command.current_dir(tmp.path());
-
-    for arg in arg_list {
-      command.arg(arg);
-    }
-
-    let output = command.output().unwrap();
-
-    let stdout = String::from_utf8(output.stdout).unwrap();
-
-    assert!(output.status.success());
-    assert_eq!(stdout, "A\nB\n");
-  }
-}
-
-#[test]
-fn different_path_arguments() {
-  let justfile_contents1 = unindent(
-    r#"
-    recipe_a:
-        echo "A"
-
-  "#,
-  );
-  let justfile_contents2 = unindent(
-    r#"
-    recipe_b:
-        echo "B"
-      "#,
-  );
-  let tmp = temptree! {
-      subdir: {
-          justfile: justfile_contents1
-      },
-      subdir2: {
-          justfile: justfile_contents2
-      }
-  };
-
-  let output = Command::new(executable_path("just"))
-    .current_dir(tmp.path())
-    .arg("subdir/recipe_a")
-    .arg("subdir2/recipe_b")
-    .output()
-    .unwrap();
-
-  let stderr = String::from_utf8(output.stderr).unwrap();
-
-  assert_eq!(
-    stderr,
-    "error: Conflicting path arguments: `subdir/` and `subdir2/`\n"
-  );
+fn argument_with_different_path_prefix_is_allowed() {
+  Test::new()
+    .justfile("foo bar:")
+    .args(["./foo", "../bar"])
+    .run();
 }