Went through the code

[xortizross]

Added what I would have done and some questions. Overall I didn't come up with any big issues, although the whole thing doesn't feel right? Are we going about this the right way? I did find a discrepancy with the proportions.

@kaijagahm You don't need to approve the pull, but this gives you a chance to review it?

[github-actions]

Thank you!

Thank you for your pull request 😃

🤖 This automated message can help you check the rendered files in your submission for clarity. If you have any questions, please feel free to open an issue in {sandpaper}.

If you have files that automatically render output (e.g. R Markdown), then you should check for the following:

• 🎯 correct output
• 🖼️ correct figures
• ❓ new warnings
• ‼️ new errors

Rendered Changes

🔍 Inspect the changes: https://github.com/carpentries-incubator/R-help-reprexes/compare/md-outputs..md-outputs-PR-91

The following changes were observed in the rendered markdown documents:

 .DS_Store                      |  Bin 6148 -> 6148 bytes
 4-minimal-reproducible-code.md |   55 ++
 config.yaml (new)              |   81 +++
 md5sum.txt                     |    2 +-
 renv.lock (new)                | 1092 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 1229 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

What does this mean?

If you have source files that require output and figures to be generated (e.g. R Markdown), then it is important to make sure the generated figures and output are reproducible.

This output provides a way for you to inspect the output in a diff-friendly manner so that it's easy to see the changes that occur due to new software versions or randomisation.

⏱️ Updated at 2024-12-12 21:21:13 +0000