Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(project): update CODEOWNERS syntax #5650

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 19, 2020
Merged

Conversation

joshblack
Copy link
Contributor

Update CODEOWNERS syntax for release files (Public API)

Changelog

New

Changed

  • Update CODEOWNERS syntax to match rest of file

Removed

Testing / Reviewing

@joshblack joshblack requested a review from a team as a code owner March 18, 2020 15:27
@ghost ghost requested review from asudoh and dakahn March 18, 2020 15:27
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 18, 2020

Deploy preview for carbon-components-react ready!

Built with commit b2d66e2

https://deploy-preview-5650--carbon-components-react.netlify.com

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 18, 2020

Deploy preview for carbon-elements ready!

Built with commit b2d66e2

https://deploy-preview-5650--carbon-elements.netlify.com

@joshblack joshblack merged commit 14d1691 into master Mar 19, 2020
@joshblack joshblack deleted the joshblack-patch-1 branch March 19, 2020 21:42
renmaddox pushed a commit to renmaddox/carbon that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2020
* chore(project): update CODEOWNERS syntax

* Update CODEOWNERS
renmaddox added a commit to renmaddox/carbon that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2020
renmaddox added a commit to renmaddox/carbon that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2020
renmaddox pushed a commit to renmaddox/carbon that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2020
* chore(project): update CODEOWNERS syntax

* Update CODEOWNERS
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants