Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat/#63 add revoke code for new badge #66

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 10, 2020

Conversation

danielvo11
Copy link
Contributor

  • create revoke code when create new badge, admin is right holder
  • create revokebadge action

@danielvo11 danielvo11 requested a review from quocle108 December 8, 2020 10:22
@danielvo11 danielvo11 force-pushed the feat/#63-add-revoke-code-for-new-badge branch from 3fef469 to 2c0921b Compare December 9, 2020 02:32
@quocle108 quocle108 merged commit 7e81700 into develop Dec 10, 2020
danielvo11 added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2021
* feat/#63 add revoke code for new badge
quocle108 added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2021
* option for community to verify packed params before execute code (#57)

* fixed default right holder for amentment code should be Admin (#58)

* fixed default right holder for amentment code should be Admin

Co-authored-by: danielAlvess <[email protected]>

* fix/gitlab#279 need filter the person who already take this position (#59)

* support RAM to exec proposal from crypto-badge (#62)

* support RAM to exec proposal from crypto-badge

* merge master to develop (#68)

* Feat/#63 add revoke code for new badge (#66)


* feat/#63 add revoke code for new badge

* feat/#64 add revoke code for old badge (#69)

* fixed verify input member account (#71)

* fixed verify input member account

Co-authored-by: Quoc Le <[email protected]>

* release v3.1.0

Co-authored-by: ChimGoKien <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Quoc Le <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants