Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove entity stable ID from generic assay name #4852

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MatthijsPon
Copy link
Contributor

Follow up to cBioPortal/cbioportal-core#7

As the ENTITY_STABLE_IDs for Generic Assays are now more strictly validated, we propose to simply hide the stable ID if the NAME property is given, instead of showing NAME (ENTITY_STABLE_ID).

Describe changes proposed in this pull request:

  • a
  • b

Checks

  • [] Has tests or has a separate issue that describes the types of test that should be created. If no test is included it should explicitly be mentioned in the PR why there is no test.
  • The commit log is comprehensible. It follows 7 rules of great commit messages. For most PRs a single commit should suffice, in some cases multiple topical commits can be useful. During review it is ok to see tiny commits (e.g. Fix reviewer comments), but right before the code gets merged to master or rc branch, any such commits should be squashed since they are useless to the other developers. Definitely avoid merge commits, use rebase instead.
  • Is this PR adding logic based on one or more clinical attributes? If yes, please make sure validation for this attribute is also present in the data validation / data loading layers (in backend repo) and documented in File-Formats Clinical data section!

Any screenshots or GIFs?

If this is a new visual feature please add a before/after screenshot or gif
here with e.g. Giphy CAPTURE or Peek

Notify reviewers

Read our Pull request merging
policy
. It can help to figure out who worked on the
file before you. Please use git blame <filename> to determine that
and notify them either through slack or by assigning them as a reviewer on the PR

@MatthijsPon MatthijsPon self-assigned this Feb 19, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 19, 2024

Deploy Preview for cbioportalfrontend ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 8d6c82a
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/cbioportalfrontend/deploys/65d349945ec3770008a54532
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-4852--cbioportalfrontend.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@inodb
Copy link
Member

inodb commented Apr 22, 2024

Could use a "use case" description to better understand why this is necessary

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants