Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to cranelift 0.32 #181

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 2, 2019

Conversation

yurydelendik
Copy link
Contributor

@yurydelendik yurydelendik commented Jul 2, 2019

@yurydelendik yurydelendik changed the title Update to cranelift 0.31 Update to cranelift 0.32 Jul 2, 2019
@sunfishcode
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@sunfishcode sunfishcode merged commit 210e959 into bytecodealliance:master Jul 2, 2019
grishasobol pushed a commit to grishasobol/wasmtime that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2021
* Replaced std with core

* Changed rust nightly to not allowed to fail in travis CI
avanhatt pushed a commit to wellesley-prog-sys/wasmtime that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
Updates the semantics of partial term specs such that the provides are
conditioned on a match, when present.

Until taking priorities into account, this has not mattered since all
matches are assumed to happen and therefore the provides is assumed to
apply also. However, without this change the logic for negated
extractors is wrong, since the provides is assumed even when the
extractor match is negated.

Updates bytecodealliance#128
avanhatt pushed a commit to wellesley-prog-sys/wasmtime that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
Updates the semantics of partial term specs such that the provides are
conditioned on a match, when present.

Until taking priorities into account, this has not mattered since all
matches are assumed to happen and therefore the provides is assumed to
apply also. However, without this change the logic for negated
extractors is wrong, since the provides is assumed even when the
extractor match is negated.

Updates bytecodealliance#128
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants