-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 628
Performance
Wenyong Huang edited this page Oct 8, 2021
·
5 revisions
Test date: 9/1/2020
CPU:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7700 CPU @ 3.60GHz
OS :ubuntu 18.04 64-bit
Compiler:gcc version 7.5.0 (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04), flag: O3
performance comparison:
workload | wamr-aot / wasm3 | wasm3 / wamr-interpreter | wamr-aot / GCC(O3) | wamr interpreters (fast/classic) |
---|---|---|---|---|
matrix | 22.02 | 1.23 | 0.68 | 2.47 |
gimli | 9.94 | 1.07 | 0.94 | 2.08 |
CoreMark | 8.79 | 1.32 | 0.79 | 2.52 |
Note:
- The numbers in the column are the performance ratios of the two runtime engines provided. Workloads
matrix
andgimli
are measured by the execution time, andCoreMark
is measured by its reported score. A/B denotes the execution_time_of_B/execution_time_of_A, or the score_of_A/score_of_B. For example, matrix 22.02 means that execution_time_of_wasm3/execution_time_of_wamr-aot is 22.02, CoreMakr 8.79 means score_of_wamr-aot/score_of_wasm3 is 8.79. - WAMR provides two interpreters - the fast version for advanced performance and and the classic version for smaller footprint respectively.
Board: nucleo_f767zi (ARMV7 Cortex-M7)
OS : Zephyr
Compiler: arm-zephyr-eabi-gcc (crosstool-NG 1.24.0.37-3f461da-dirty) 9.2.0, Os
performance comparison:
workload | wamr-aot/wasm3 | wasm3/wamr-interpreter | wamr interpreters (fast/classic) |
---|---|---|---|
matrix | 30.17 | 1.06 | 1.65 |
gimli | 19.13 | 1.11 | 2.03 |
seqhash | 21.12 | 1.15 | 1.34 |
workload: CoreMark
measurement tool: valgrind/massif
WASM interpreter | Peak memory usage |
---|---|
WAMR classic | 365KB |
WAMR fast | 485KB |
wasm3 | 514KB |
Compilation option: -Os
Workload | GCC compiled native binary (Bytes) | Wasm bytecode (Bytes) | iwasm-aot module (Bytes) |
---|---|---|---|
coremark | 23120 | 10457 | 17348 |
base64 | 8792 | 1026 | 1840 |
gimli | 8640 | 498 | 1080 |
The page is also a response to the data published by wasm3 at https://github.com/wasm3/wasm3/blob/master/docs/Performance.md.
Some background of the performance comparison between WAMR and wasm3:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasm-micro-runtime/issues/134
WebAssembly Micro Runtime