Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Add more documentation on how to work with rules #85

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 12, 2024

Conversation

bvanelli
Copy link
Owner

Improves and polishes documentation for running rules locally. Includes examples on how to runs rules on newly created transactions, as well as including the rules and exceptions on the documentation.

Closes #68

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.66%. Comparing base (3a69ca6) to head (0758951).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #85   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.66%   97.66%           
=======================================
  Files          16       16           
  Lines        2188     2188           
=======================================
  Hits         2137     2137           
  Misses         51       51           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@bvanelli bvanelli merged commit e7503be into main Oct 12, 2024
8 checks passed
@bvanelli bvanelli deleted the docs/running-rules branch October 12, 2024 17:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

reconcile_transaction() somehow breaks the "rules" functionality on actual
1 participant