-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 596
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Disentangle non-GVS code from GVS code [VS-834] #8229
Conversation
5976e35
to
1a14338
Compare
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## ah_var_store #8229 +/- ##
================================================
Coverage ? 83.987%
Complexity ? 34800
================================================
Files ? 2194
Lines ? 167016
Branches ? 18003
================================================
Hits ? 140271
Misses ? 20518
Partials ? 6227 |
Github actions tests reported job failures from actions build 4309218748
|
@@ -77,7 +76,7 @@ public static VCFFormatHeaderLine getEquivalentFormatHeaderLine(final String inf | |||
addFilterLine(new VCFFilterHeaderLine(VCFConstants.PASSES_FILTERS_v4, "Site contains at least one allele that passes filters")); | |||
|
|||
addFilterLine(new VCFFilterHeaderLine(NAY_FROM_YNG, "Considered a NAY in the Yay, Nay, Grey table")); | |||
addFilterLine(new VCFFilterHeaderLine(EXCESS_ALLELES,"Site has an excess of alternate alleles based on the input threshold (default is " + CommonCode.EXCESS_ALLELES_THRESHOLD + ")")); | |||
addFilterLine(new VCFFilterHeaderLine(EXCESS_ALLELES,"Site has an excess of alternate alleles based on the input threshold")); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why did the info about the default go away?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch! 😄 Because this code is in a non-GVS package and it was reaching into a GVS package to grab that. There could be other, better ways of solving this problem.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
More prep work for separating GVS code: remove references to GVS code from non-GVS code. Integration test currently running here.