-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 596
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
provide the user with fine-grained control over read filters #260
Comments
closing. will reopen if this is actually a requirement |
Depends what fine grained control means. User should not have control over default filters that are considered essential by walker authors. User should have control over optional filters that provide eg convenience functions for selecting subsets of data (eg read group based, cigar based, etc). |
yes, this ticked was about the former. feel free to enter another ticket for the latter (with a usecase) |
Ok-- off the top of your head, do you already have/plan porting existing read filters? |
* filter out AS_QD, SOR, FS from cohort extract VCF * change files to original and expected * delete commented out lines
* filter out AS_QD, SOR, FS from cohort extract VCF * change files to original and expected * delete commented out lines
provide the user with fine-grained control over read filters (should wait until after we see what read filters end up looking like in the dataflow world)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: