-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support procedural cosmetic filtering #16935
Comments
How many filters makes use of other procedural selector? (e.g. |
I did a survey of procedural filter operator counts in Brave's default lists a few days ago:
It's not an exact metric since some filters can contain multiple chained operators, and
The recent efforts on edit: 172 occurrences of edit again: |
Hi Braver, Is there any update on this open ticket. I happy to contribute. |
Verification
Confirmed following numbered test cases are passed
|
Verification
Confirmed following numbered test cases are passed
|
Verified on
Using test plan in brave/brave-core#24688 (comment)
|
Verified on
Using test plan in brave/brave-core#24688 (comment)
|
Verification
Confirmed following numbered test cases are passed
|
Verified on
Observed the issue #40771 which is not a blocker according to @antonok-edmSTEPS:
ACTUAL RESULTS:
|
Procedural cosmetic filtering is useful for the most evasive kinds of in-content sponsored/promoted material. It'd be great to implement this and tie it to aggressive shields settings, to handle the last few examples of cosmetic items slipping through on Reddit, YouTube, Facebook, etc.
See also:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: