-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for WordPress 5.0 and the new editor - Gutenberg #25
Comments
The new editor uses "dashicons" which are actually SVG's. |
For the oik-block-opinions.php routine in oik-block, oik-bob-bing-wide may respond to a number of the filters it invokes. |
Note: The |
Where dashicons are being generated in shortcodes the test cases will need changing. See |
Blocks to be delivered by oik-bob-bing-wide, copied and cobbled from oik-blocks are listed below
|
Whilst implementing support for blocks using the shared libraries we may as well take the opportunity to make oik-bob-bing-wide operate as a standalone plugin, using similar logic to that implemented for oik-css and uk-tides. The [bw_csv] shortcode makes use of In order to use the |
…ashicon and [bw_dash]. Remove duplicates from dashicon list. Avoid keys message from React
… oik-bbw/search server side rendering
This was released in v1.34.0 on 30 Jan 2020 to oik-plugins.com There are still problems when both blocks are used in a post and the [bw_csv] shortcode is used in a classic block. This has to be resolved when I update the documenation for the oik base plugin. |
That's what I did. Each CSV block that was generated contained unwanted |
Oik v4.0.0 has been released. The tables on the plugin page have been updated.
|
Since early 2017 a new editor has been under development. Code named Gutenberg this new editor is being developed as a feature plugin. It is expected to be merged into core for WordPress 5.0.
We need to be aware of Gutenberg and to attempt to be compatible with it.
Actually, it's the other way round. Gutenberg needs to be backward compatible with us.
According to Gutenberg's README.
That's not the case right now.
I've already raised an issue against Gutenberg ( # 4456 ) which affects the
[bw_csv]
shortcode.It probably also affects the
[bw_rpt]
shortcode in exactly the same way.Problems
Workarounds?
For 4456 - new lines being ignored
[bw_csv]
and[bw_rpt]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: