Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - Prevent PR benchmarks to run on label changes #2119

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

raskad
Copy link
Member

@raskad raskad commented Jun 13, 2022

This changes the trigger type for PR benchmarks back to the default (opened, synchronize, reopened). As part of #2114 I added the labeled trigger type. This causes the benchmarks to run when the run-benchmark label is present and another label is added.
For example in #2116 I added the run-benchmark label while creating the PR. The benchmarks then where triggered six times; one for the PR creation (opened) and five times for each label that I initially added to the PR.

The only drawback is that the benchmarks are not triggered, when we just add the label, but unfortunately I don't have a clever idea on how to achieve that right now. We will have to add the label and then trigger the run via a synchronize (push).

@raskad raskad added the github_actions Pull requests that update Github_actions code label Jun 13, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

Test262 conformance changes

VM implementation

Test result main count PR count difference
Total 90,499 90,499 0
Passed 56,518 56,518 0
Ignored 23,580 23,580 0
Failed 10,401 10,401 0
Panics 0 0 0
Conformance 62.45% 62.45% 0.00%

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 13, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #2119 (ad858ea) into main (8af90a7) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2119   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   43.57%   43.57%           
=======================================
  Files         217      217           
  Lines       19695    19695           
=======================================
  Hits         8583     8583           
  Misses      11112    11112           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8af90a7...ad858ea. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@jedel1043 jedel1043 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unfortunate. Still pretty usable though

@Razican
Copy link
Member

Razican commented Jun 13, 2022

bors r+

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2022
This changes the trigger type for PR benchmarks back to the default (`opened`, `synchronize`, `reopened`).  As part of #2114 I added the `labeled` trigger type. This causes the benchmarks to run when the `run-benchmark` label is present and another label is added.
For example in #2116 I added the `run-benchmark` label while creating the PR. The benchmarks then where triggered six times; one for the PR creation (`opened`) and five times for each label that I initially added to the PR.

The only drawback is that the benchmarks are not triggered, when we just add the label, but unfortunately I don't have a clever idea on how to achieve that right now. We will have to add the label and then trigger the run via a `synchronize` (push).
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Jun 13, 2022

Pull request successfully merged into main.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title Prevent PR benchmarks to run on label changes [Merged by Bors] - Prevent PR benchmarks to run on label changes Jun 13, 2022
@bors bors bot closed this Jun 13, 2022
@bors bors bot deleted the prevent-multiple-benchmarks branch June 13, 2022 20:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
github_actions Pull requests that update Github_actions code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants