Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add precompiled contracts for light client #102

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 30, 2024

Conversation

keefel
Copy link
Contributor

@keefel keefel commented Apr 29, 2024

Description

add precompiled contracts for light client validation

Rationale

The precompiled contracts for light client validation should not be removed here.

Example

NA

Changes

Notable changes:

  • NA

@github-actions github-actions bot requested review from bnoieh and krish-nr April 29, 2024 10:55
@welkin22
Copy link
Contributor

Description

add precompiled contracts for light client validation

Rationale

The precompiled contracts for light client validation should not be removed here.

Example

NA

Changes

Notable changes:

  • NA

@keefel Hi, According to my understanding, Geth has removed the entire light client, as you can see the light option has been removed in gcMode. Please confirm this modification again.
If they are not the same thing, please provide further context and background knowledge to help us determine if the modification is feasible.

@keefel
Copy link
Contributor Author

keefel commented Apr 30, 2024

Description

add precompiled contracts for light client validation

Rationale

The precompiled contracts for light client validation should not be removed here.

Example

NA

Changes

Notable changes:

  • NA

@keefel Hi, According to my understanding, Geth has removed the entire light client, as you can see the light option has been removed in gcMode. Please confirm this modification again. If they are not the same thing, please provide further context and background knowledge to help us determine if the modification is feasible.

The light client verification is utilized for Greenfield cross-chain communication, which differs from what you mentioned.

@welkin22
Copy link
Contributor

After communicating with my colleagues, I found the original PR: #7. Yes, we do need this modification in order to support Greenfield cross-chain. We overlooked this during the merge process. Thank you @keefel. Good catch!

@welkin22 welkin22 merged commit c013d95 into merge/for_4844_merge Apr 30, 2024
2 checks passed
@sysvm sysvm deleted the fix_light_client branch July 29, 2024 09:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants