Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BEP-311: Implement EIP-3651 Warm COINBASE #311

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 17, 2023

Conversation

buddh0
Copy link
Contributor

@buddh0 buddh0 commented Oct 30, 2023

  BEP: 311
  Title: Implement EIP-3651: Warm COINBASE
  Status: Draft
  Type: Standards
  Created: 2023-10-30

BEP-311: Implement EIP-3651 Warm COINBASE

1. Summary

As part of Shanghai upgrade, EIP-3651: Warm COINBASE is required to be implemented to BSC.

2. Abstract

The COINBASE address shall be warm at the start of transaction execution, in accordance with the actual cost of reading that account.

3. Motivation

Direct COINBASE payments are becoming increasingly popular because they allow conditional payments, which provide benefits such as implicit cancellation of transactions that would revert.
But accessing COINBASE is overpriced; the address is initially cold under the access list framework introduced in EIP-2929.
This gas cost mismatch can incentivize alternative payments besides ETH, such as ERC-20, but ETH should be the primary means of paying for transactions on Ethereum.

4. Specification

At the start of transaction execution, accessed_addresses shall be initialized to also include the address returned by COINBASE (0x41).

5. Rationale

The addresses currently initialized warm are the addresses that should already be loaded at the start of transaction validation.
The ORIGIN address is always loaded to check its balance against the gas limit and the gas price.
The tx.to address is always loaded to begin execution.
The COINBASE address should also be always be loaded because it receives the block reward and the transaction fees.

6. Backwards Compatibility

There are no known backward compatibility issues presented by this change.

7. Security Considerations

There are no known security considerations introduced by this change.

8. License

The content is licensed under CC0.

9. Reference

William Morriss (@wjmelements), "EIP-3651: Warm COINBASE," Ethereum Improvement Proposals, no. 3651, July 2021. [Online serial]. Available: https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3651.

@buddh0 buddh0 force-pushed the bep310-warm-coinbase branch from fec0bad to a52ee4a Compare October 30, 2023 07:32
@buddh0 buddh0 changed the title BEP-310: Warm COINBASE BEP-310: Implement EIP-3651 Warm COINBASE Oct 30, 2023
@buddh0 buddh0 changed the title BEP-310: Implement EIP-3651 Warm COINBASE BEP-311: Implement EIP-3651 Warm COINBASE Nov 17, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@brilliant-lx brilliant-lx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants