-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 80
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add Mavftp service, read-only for now #926
Open
Williangalvani
wants to merge
2
commits into
bluerobotics:master
Choose a base branch
from
Williangalvani:mavftp
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
+24
−1
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Williangalvani
force-pushed
the
mavftp
branch
from
September 9, 2022 15:52
e768ae2
to
241b9a6
Compare
Williangalvani
force-pushed
the
mavftp
branch
3 times, most recently
from
May 9, 2024 20:12
fc9e4ce
to
112ab26
Compare
Williangalvani
changed the title
add Mavftp service
add Mavftp service, read-only for now
Jun 20, 2024
Williangalvani
force-pushed
the
mavftp
branch
2 times, most recently
from
June 20, 2024 15:27
046cdc0
to
b16dea5
Compare
Williangalvani
requested review from
patrickelectric,
joaoantoniocardoso and
JoaoMario109
June 20, 2024 16:21
patrickelectric
requested changes
Jun 20, 2024
3 tasks
Williangalvani
force-pushed
the
mavftp
branch
from
September 30, 2024 19:45
b16dea5
to
547ecd8
Compare
changed it so it gets code from pymavlink directly. currently WIP as we wait for the PR to be merged over there |
Williangalvani
force-pushed
the
mavftp
branch
2 times, most recently
from
October 4, 2024 19:53
240dccf
to
b04b92f
Compare
Williangalvani
force-pushed
the
mavftp
branch
from
October 17, 2024 00:12
b04b92f
to
474a6af
Compare
JoaoMario109
approved these changes
Oct 22, 2024
argument=14555, | ||
persistent=True, | ||
protected=True, | ||
), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can't we use one of our internal endpoints already ?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This will help #457
thanks @ES-Alexander for the help =]
This adds a mavftp folder under ardupilot_logs
we should probably fix ArduPilot/ardupilot#23339 or just disable it if a navigator is running.
this is a heavily modified of https://github.com/ArduPilot/MAVProxy/blob/master/MAVProxy/modules/mavproxy_ftp.py
I added a fuse layer for it to work with the filelbrowser, and tried to better encapsulate functionality.
That said, I hate it. but it works.
I still think we should probably move this to a dedicated rust service later on.
I thought of using mavlink2rest, but I'm worried about the performance of assembling the arraybuffers from the jsons.
That would also go against my idea of upstreaming this to ardupilot eventually.
This could be further cleaned, but I'll open it for review to double-check this is path we want to follow.