Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RM-45-records_mover-db-redshift-records_copy.py-13-1-C901-redshift_copy_options-is-too-complex-27 #237

Conversation

ryantimjohn
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@ryantimjohn ryantimjohn force-pushed the RM-45-records_mover-db-redshift-records_copy.py-13-1-C901-redshift_copy_options-is-too-complex-27 branch from 3881656 to 31f4e7e Compare April 12, 2023 15:29
This reverts commit e9229d1.

RM-45 Simplify redshift_copy

RM-45 first draft

RM-45 refactor into separate functions

RM-45 lower flake8 violations

RM-45 assign redshift_options compression

RM-45 correct quotechar call

RM-45 fix temporal call

RM-45 fix dict invocation

RM-45 fix mypy errors

RM-45 fix unit tests

RM-45 try fix unit tests

RM-45 try unit test fix

Revert "RM-45 try unit test fix"

This reverts commit 31f4e7e.

Revert "RM-45 try fix unit tests"

This reverts commit ab9a21d.
@ryantimjohn ryantimjohn force-pushed the RM-45-records_mover-db-redshift-records_copy.py-13-1-C901-redshift_copy_options-is-too-complex-27 branch from 1588a0e to 2fbfcae Compare April 12, 2023 15:30
….py-13-1-C901-redshift_copy_options-is-too-complex-27
RM-45 type ignore

RM-45 fix typecheck

RM-45 put avro on top

RM-45 use redshift_copy_parameters

RM-45 noqa on compression hints

RM-45 reinstate write_dfs call

RM-45 set default value for move_count
@ryantimjohn ryantimjohn force-pushed the RM-45-records_mover-db-redshift-records_copy.py-13-1-C901-redshift_copy_options-is-too-complex-27 branch from 25287c5 to 69b0812 Compare April 13, 2023 14:03
@ryantimjohn ryantimjohn marked this pull request as ready for review April 13, 2023 14:04
@ryantimjohn
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Brunope, thanks for your help! Ready for review.

@ryantimjohn ryantimjohn marked this pull request as draft April 14, 2023 13:02
@ryantimjohn
Copy link
Contributor Author

ryantimjohn commented Apr 14, 2023

converted back to draft for the Factory pattern refactor

@ryantimjohn ryantimjohn marked this pull request as ready for review April 17, 2023 15:15
@ryantimjohn
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Brunope just added docstrings after the approval so assuming it's okay to merge 😉

@ryantimjohn ryantimjohn added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 17, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit b591b4e Apr 17, 2023
@ryantimjohn ryantimjohn deleted the RM-45-records_mover-db-redshift-records_copy.py-13-1-C901-redshift_copy_options-is-too-complex-27 branch April 17, 2023 16:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants