-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RM-42 job config schema too complex #231
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e46b9a5
Refactor job_config_schema_as_args_parser into smaller functions
Brunope 892d199
remove unused type ignore
Brunope b1c2bb6
ratchet flake8
Brunope b67d1ea
create new job config object to parse sub properties
Brunope d2cecfa
typo
Brunope 7c901e4
move required_keys handling to configure_from_properties
Brunope c5f67ef
Merge branch 'main' into RM-42-job-config-schema-too-complex
Brunope 977103f
bump quality metrics
Brunope 1259e23
Merge branch 'main' into RM-42-job-config-schema-too-complex
Brunope File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1 +1 @@ | ||
4 | ||
3 |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1 +1 @@ | ||
92.1900 | ||
91.6400 |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Really not a huge fan of setting self vars outside of
__init__
, but it does make the rest of the code easier. To move it to__init__
would require making new overloaded init functions that accept more params, which I'm not sure I want to doThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
that makes sense. Does adding a
setter
method to the class make sense? Then, at least, when assessing the class's code, you'd know what potential attributes the class had?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you explain a bit more? I'm not really sure what you mean
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, please ignore last comment, wrote very quickly.
Basically, I wonder if it just makes sense to break out the piece where you assign the
required_keys
attribute into a separateset_required_keys
method and then just call that method in theconfigure_from_properties
method. Not sure it's worth the trouble.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, sure, is the goal simply to make it more explicit?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yep!