You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A listing in san jose had multiple units without the rent or rent as percentage income specified. This led to the experience captured down below. Further testing showed that a single unit without rent information was handled by showing n/a but multiple was leading to this confusing output. Ideally, the multiple units case should also display as n/a
QA: https://bloom.exygy.dev/ and https://partners.bloom.exygy.dev/sign-in
Add multiple units of the same unit type to a listing that have no rent or rent as a percentage of income information. Ensure that the unit summary displays with n/a rather than NaN per month.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A listing in san jose had multiple units without the rent or rent as percentage income specified. This led to the experience captured down below. Further testing showed that a single unit without rent information was handled by showing n/a but multiple was leading to this confusing output. Ideally, the multiple units case should also display as n/a
QA: https://bloom.exygy.dev/ and https://partners.bloom.exygy.dev/sign-in
Add multiple units of the same unit type to a listing that have no rent or rent as a percentage of income information. Ensure that the unit summary displays with n/a rather than NaN per month.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: