Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: dont mark version as dirty temporarily and investigate git status #2008

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jul 9, 2024

Conversation

gak
Copy link
Contributor

@gak gak commented Jul 8, 2024

No description provided.

@gak gak requested a review from alecthomas as a code owner July 8, 2024 22:30
@gak gak requested review from a team and worstell and removed request for a team July 8, 2024 22:30
@ftl-robot ftl-robot mentioned this pull request Jul 8, 2024
@gak gak force-pushed the gak/temp-not-dirty branch from f1b5ee8 to 3f4b8f7 Compare July 8, 2024 22:50
@gak gak requested a review from deniseli July 9, 2024 01:31
Comment on lines +54 to +55
git diff

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this for logging @gak?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I need to see what is causing the repo to be dirty.

Comment on lines +481 to +487
type ModuleSecret struct {
ID int64
CreatedAt time.Time
Module optional.Option[string]
Name string
Url string
}
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm guessing this is unrelated, but needed to be checked in?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is related to code generated in the CI causing the repo to be dirty. I'm under the impression these sqlc files needed to be checked in?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your impression is correct :) Looks like whoever added ModuleSecret to the db schema just didn't know they needed to run just build-sqlc.

@gak gak merged commit aef7543 into main Jul 9, 2024
47 checks passed
@gak gak deleted the gak/temp-not-dirty branch July 9, 2024 01:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants