Add (elementary) inference loops? #85
rlouf
started this conversation in
New features
Replies: 2 comments
-
I think that's a good idea - i am not too worry about the scope change, but there might be a discussion to have on how extensive we want the API to be (allow to accept kernel, etc) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Maybe a starting point would be to implement it as common utility in the
tests folder and not directly in the public API to see how often it needs
to be modified (as in, can it be stable or is it doomed to change every
time a new method is implemented)?
…On Tue, 3 Aug 2021, 18:35 Junpeng Lao, ***@***.***> wrote:
I think that's a good idea - i am not too worry about the scope change,
but there might be a discussion to have on how extensive we want the API to
be (allow to accept kernel, etc)
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GithHub
<#85 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEYGFZYDRZDQIB6PKE6LV7DT3AEC3ANCNFSM5BPCDOWQ>
.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
blackjax
purposefully does not provide inference loops at the moment. This could be however useful for two main reasons:We could use MCX's inference engine, where we use JAX's host callbacks to add a progress bar within
scan
with very little overhead.This is an open discussion since this changes slightly the scope of the library.
@junpenglao
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions