-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 648
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor get_top_markets issue #842 #1549
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some minor changes in the constructor may allow for in-place construction.
price latest_price = asset( mto.latest_base, mto.base ) / asset( mto.latest_quote, mto.quote ); | ||
if( mto.base != asset_base.id ) | ||
latest_price = ~latest_price; | ||
latest = database_api_impl::price_to_string( latest_price, asset_base, asset_quote ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Refactor suggestion (may be out of the scope of this ticket): put database_api_impl::price_to_string in some kind of common area. market_ticker should not have to know about database_api_impl, and database_api_impl::price_to_string shouldn't know about graphene::app::price_to_string.
@jmjatlanta you may have interest in the first PR (#924) where we've addressed some issues. It's a pity that the code was abandoned. |
I had refactored to in-place constructor by comments from @jmjatlanta and by using parts of #924 |
@abitmore please have a look for Review of this PR. Thanks |
Thanks. I took a look at it. This code looks very similar now. Is there something that you liked better in #924? Or is it just the fact that it was done twice? |
This is a replacement for pull request #1273 for issue #842.
Sorry i had to do it this way, the reason of the replacement is build problems at
oxarbitrage:issue842
that i was not able to fix by merging thedevelop
into the feature branch. Some issue with the websocket submodule.Anyway, to avoid losing too much time on it i created this one that is almost the same(the last review comments were already addressed in #1273). On top of that, new pull modifies the method names according to our (not written yet) style guide: #1318 (comment)