Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor get_top_markets issue #842 #1549

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 5, 2019

Conversation

oxarbitrage
Copy link
Member

This is a replacement for pull request #1273 for issue #842.

Sorry i had to do it this way, the reason of the replacement is build problems at oxarbitrage:issue842 that i was not able to fix by merging the develop into the feature branch. Some issue with the websocket submodule.
Anyway, to avoid losing too much time on it i created this one that is almost the same(the last review comments were already addressed in #1273). On top of that, new pull modifies the method names according to our (not written yet) style guide: #1318 (comment)

Copy link
Contributor

@jmjatlanta jmjatlanta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some minor changes in the constructor may allow for in-place construction.

price latest_price = asset( mto.latest_base, mto.base ) / asset( mto.latest_quote, mto.quote );
if( mto.base != asset_base.id )
latest_price = ~latest_price;
latest = database_api_impl::price_to_string( latest_price, asset_base, asset_quote );
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Refactor suggestion (may be out of the scope of this ticket): put database_api_impl::price_to_string in some kind of common area. market_ticker should not have to know about database_api_impl, and database_api_impl::price_to_string shouldn't know about graphene::app::price_to_string.

libraries/app/database_api.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
libraries/app/database_api.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
libraries/app/database_api.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@abitmore
Copy link
Member

abitmore commented Feb 1, 2019

@jmjatlanta you may have interest in the first PR (#924) where we've addressed some issues. It's a pity that the code was abandoned.

@oxarbitrage
Copy link
Member Author

I had refactored to in-place constructor by comments from @jmjatlanta and by using parts of #924

@ryanRfox
Copy link
Contributor

ryanRfox commented Feb 5, 2019

@abitmore please have a look for Review of this PR. Thanks

@jmjatlanta
Copy link
Contributor

@jmjatlanta you may have interest in the first PR (#924) where we've addressed some issues. It's a pity that the code was abandoned.

Thanks. I took a look at it. This code looks very similar now. Is there something that you liked better in #924? Or is it just the fact that it was done twice?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants