We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In database:check_for_blackswan() in db_update.cpp:
database:check_for_blackswan()
auto call_min = price::min( bitasset.options.short_backing_asset, mia.id ); auto call_max = price::max( bitasset.options.short_backing_asset, mia.id ); auto call_itr = call_price_index.lower_bound( call_min ); auto call_end = call_price_index.upper_bound( call_max ); ... auto least_collateral = call_itr->collateralization();
Due to possibility of being partially called, the position with lowest call_price can have higher collateral ratio than others.
Perhaps can see this as a duplicate of #343 .
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Test case reproduces #338 #343 #453 #606 #625 #649
c58d00b
Test case for #338 #343 #453 #606 #625 #649 fixes
1a68c32
Add cross-hardfork tests #338 #343 #453 #606 #649
a8a0245
10298ca
e5fc5d4
a8391d8
Done with #829.
Sorry, something went wrong.
abitmore
No branches or pull requests
In
database:check_for_blackswan()
in db_update.cpp:Due to possibility of being partially called, the position with lowest call_price can have higher collateral ratio than others.
Perhaps can see this as a duplicate of #343 .
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: